Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> Tune 2000 <br /> Page 11. <br /> Mr. Brabants stated he compromised and moved it another 8'. This is a case <br /> where it is not a wetlands issue, it is a ease of animal habitat. If this is an <br /> animal habitat that needs to be preserved for any reason, but he has letters <br /> that here are no endangered species, he has hired a scientist. The sane <br /> animals that are on there, presumably red fox, squirrels, he can take out <br /> Bunting license from November 1st to February 21h and there is no daily <br /> limit on how many he can kill. He checked with the State and he can trap on <br /> there. It is ridiculous that he is being put through jumping through hoops to <br /> preserve something that the Mate is paying people to kill. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked to see the plans? <br /> Mr. Brabants. stated he would like to go deeper because the real issue is the <br /> habitat. This is the new plan he submitted. The pointed to the whole lot and <br /> also pointed out the portion he is using. He moved this back, in some places <br /> 1 ' ". The Conservation Agent proposed he move it back 3 . when he had a <br /> conversation with the Agent on Tuesday morning, she reminded hire that he <br /> did not have to have setbacks....Mr. Sherman interrupted to Mate that Mr. <br /> Brabants is referring to the Assistant Conservation Agent. Mr. Brabants <br /> stated he would like to have a setback of at least 13' 'from the next lot and if <br /> the work limit is lien (pointing) there is no doubt that he could physically <br /> build a house in that space, but it would not be the intent for which he <br /> bought the land. <br /> 1 . Rosenberg Mated someone should have advised Mr. Brabants about the <br /> regulations before he purchased the land. Mr. Brabants Mated he talked to <br /> Bob Sherman February 'nth. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated, for the record, at the time he talked to Mr. Brabants <br /> and the time he talked to Michael Grot ke, he told them no one had been to <br /> the site yet and the discussions were preliminary......Mr. Brab ants <br /> interjected, about vernal pools. Mr. Sherman stated itwasn't the final <br /> determination. Mr. Brabants agreed he did say that, but before he bought <br /> this land he had engineers cheek, he had the scientist, because he said, "Let"s <br /> wake sure there is not a wetland issue". After he dict all the work on the <br /> wetlands, the day he was supposed to cone to the hearing, the Assistant <br /> Conservation Agent contacted Mike Grot ke and said there is a new problem, <br /> wetlands isn't an issue, it is now wildlife habitat. <br /> Ms Boretos stated Mr. Brabants is giving misinformation to the Commission. <br /> That is not what she told Mr. Grot ke. <br />