Laserfiche WebLink
June 2000 <br /> Page 1 , <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated that has nothing to do with this because it is obvious <br /> from looking at the plan that it is possible to build on that lot and to stay <br /> within the line 3 ' from the coastal bank. That is the only issue here. <br /> Mr. Brabants stated it is not impossible to build, he could build a house that <br /> would suit somebody else, but again, he bought the land, he pars the taxes, <br /> he happens to Ter with both him and Ms Boretos on the fact that ghat he is <br /> forced to do on his own land...... <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated he had better argue with the state. Mr. Brabants <br /> stated he will. He will not waste any more of the Commission's time because <br /> he really Bels this is unjustified and unrealistic. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked, for the record, if what Mr. Brabants was saying that he <br /> is unwilling to reconsider. Mr. Brabants stated he has reconsidered <br /> and.....Mr. Sherman stated and would be unwilling to do further <br /> considerations. Mr. Brabants stated the piece of land, if he could juste there <br /> was something more the Commission was taring to protect, when they are <br /> talking about red foxes, he realizes here he does not have much of a shot but <br /> he feels from talking to a number of people, including attorneys and people <br /> from the state, that this is a precedent that has not been used on a typical <br /> building lot. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons begged to differ, this is done every other week.. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg moved to reject the application, Mrs. Moore seconded. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked, for the record, if Mr. Brabants is stating he won't <br /> reconsider, Mr. Brabants stated he has considered. Mr. Sherman stated it is <br /> his right to appeal. <br /> VO E: Motion made and seconded to reject the application. Unanimous <br /> Vote. <br /> DENIED. <br /> 9:00 WILLOWBEND DEVELOPMENT CORP., 267 wind gate Road, <br /> continued from 5/11/00. <br /> VOTE, Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 6 July 2000 <br /> at 7:15 p.m. at the request of the applicant. Unanimous vote. <br />