12/14/2000 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

14 December 2000 Page 11, 'ISE: Motion made and seconded to close with a condition for Plan revision date 12/4/00. Unanimous Vote. CLOSET - CONTRI'T'ION. 5 7:40 CHILL NDEVELOPMENT CO., INC., 138 Waterway, continued from 16 November 2000. Michael Grotzke presenting. Mr. Sherman-stated there are a large number of trees to be removed. He told therm they meed a wetland scientist to do an evaluation. He was told. Mike Hall has been hired. Mr. Sherman stated-the coastal bark is not in the right place. over 50 trees are going. The area does have wildlife habitat significance. The issue is mitigation for wildlife habitat. He would life to see therm reconfigure the alteration to get it above the top of the coastal bark for the statutory reason and the performance standards for coastal bank. After that, mitigative plantings can be discussed. Mr. trot l e stated they are doing the two houses next to this as well and had to stay behind. They are trying to honor the o' setback. Mr. Sherman stated the o' setback is the minimum. i Mr. Rosenberg stated they are altering the topography of the lard. They are going to fill in over the 0' lime. Lawn is not very beneficial to habitat, Mr. Sherman stated from their measurements, it slid not meet the criteria for coastal bank. It is steeper than 1-10, The coastal -bark is up here. He could not sign off on the coastal bank. Ms. Boretos suggested moving the house back and getting a variance for the septic system.. Mr. Sherman stated yes, if that is possible. It was noted this is not a special permit area. Mr. Sherman stated this lot is well treed. He has not seen mitigation commensurate with the loss of trees. The top of ban needs to be shown correctly. Mr. Rosenberg senberg was concerned with the amount of impervious coverage. Mr. Sherman stated that the wall is going to be subject to a wave environment during a storm. It is ars A zone but could have waves up t