Laserfiche WebLink
14 December 2000 <br /> Page 13. <br /> Mr. Sherman did not raise that issue because once above'the top of the <br /> bank it is a buffer fer zone where there are specific performance <br /> standards. He recommended mended giving Mr. trot l e and his client a chance <br /> to review them- options. Mr. trot l e asked to meet with Mr. Sherman <br /> prior to the next meeting . Mr. Sherman stated there should at least be <br /> an agreement on the top of bark line. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> NOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue at the request of the <br /> Applicant to 4January 2001 at 7:30 p.m. Unanimous Note. <br /> HEARINGS CONTINUED. <br /> 7:45 LAWRENCE E. BACON on a proposal for expansion of ars existing <br /> residence and deeps, landscape work, driveway reconfiguration and <br /> septic system inspection and repair at 56 Waterway. Michael trot ke <br /> resenting. The bedroom to be enlarged is not increasing the number o <br /> bedrooms. The hatched area is the deck.. 'hey are building out on the <br /> deep. It is a very level lot. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked where the landscape work would take place? Mr. <br /> Grotz e advised it is in the driveway, forward of the existing house. The <br /> e tie * in the front; it will not reed repair. It i t <br /> out o he ort <br /> description. <br /> Mr. Johansen stated there is nothing on the septic in the description .of <br /> work. Mr. Grotzl e stated it was left as an option but they can come back <br /> and amend the order. Board of Appeals is not needed. <br /> Publiccomment: Trove. <br /> TE: Motion made and seconded to close and issue pending DBP <br /> Number and verification of the number of bedrooms. . <br /> Unanimous Note. <br /> CLOSE AND ISSUE, <br /> 7:50 GARY 11., LOCARNO on a proposal for improvement to, and <br /> vegetative mitigation. near, 4' wide path to dock, general mitigative and <br /> landscape plantings at 51 Waterline. Drive South. Michael trot ke <br /> presenting. <br />