My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/1/2001 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
3/1/2001 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2018 5:08:18 PM
Creation date
2/28/2018 1:11:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/01/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i He informed the Commission he is restricted to remain within <br /> the building footprint. There is no basement space at the <br /> dwelling. The proposed shed would consist of 10 x 12 area, it is <br /> within legal limits, approval has been received from the Building <br /> Inspector. <br /> References were being made to a plan indicating the proposed <br /> location of the shed. <br /> Mr. Sherman determined from the Applicant that Board of <br /> Appeals variance is not required. <br /> Diane Boretos recommended a Negative 3 Determination. <br /> i <br /> There being no further Commission or public comment, the <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> oT o : John Johansen rade a Motion for Negative <br /> Determination; which Motion was seconded by Carel Moore and so <br /> voted unanimously. <br /> 7 -. 15-Elliot Rosenberg, for a Determination of Applicability <br /> on proposed topping of trees with maintenance in perpetuity at 1 <br /> Pontiac Road, Assessors Map 125, Block 61. <br /> Mr. Sherman explained the permit in this natter has expired, <br /> proposed work is not located within the first 50-feet, request is <br /> being rade to top some previously topped trees . <br /> Mr.. Sherr an had suggested Applicant file for a renewal as he <br /> had been unaware of said expiration of permit. He recommended a <br /> Negative Determination. <br /> The Chairman asked for clarification of "topping" . cutting <br /> off the tree tops. <br /> 1► r. Sherman explained request is being made to cut those <br /> upper branches which have grown back into the view field as <br /> result of a previous cut (vista pruning, not within the first <br /> 50-feet) . <br /> The Chairman further .inquired as to whether or not this <br /> procedure should tape place prior to March 31st in order to <br /> insure nesting for the birds. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the cut off date to be March 1st. <br /> However, the weather having been so cold, and the landscaper <br /> agreeing to do a minimal amount of cutting within the next few <br /> days, approval was rec nmended. <br /> There being no further Commission or public comment, the <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.