Laserfiche WebLink
narrative, paid invoice from landscaper, and agreed upon <br /> completion date {October 15th) ; which lotion was seconded by <br /> Ralph Shaw and so voted unanimously. <br /> 8 : 35 John Coyne for Determination of Applicability on the <br /> installation of a six 1 foot cedar fence and removal of <br /> vegetation at 32 Waterline Drive, Assessors Map 120, ]Block 119 . <br /> Mr. Sherman provided pictures of the property. Upon <br /> inspection Mr. Sherman found new mulch had been put down, further <br /> investigation showed that underneath the mulch Was a lump, a <br /> nearly cut tree. Approximately one dozen sizeable oak trees have <br /> been cut down, there being very little existing vegetation. <br /> Mr. he=ars suggested Applicant- withdraw. Vader the ACt the <br /> Commission would have to approve, there being no buffer zone/ .and <br /> subject to coastal storm flowage standards . The By-law requires <br /> maintenance of a certain amount of natural vegetation. <br /> Mr. Sherman disagreed with Applicant , s request to continue <br /> the matter, other than to clarify the situation with Applicant . <br /> Elliot Rosenberg suggested granting the continuance, at <br /> which time a Notice of violation could be issued, <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he would issue an Enforcement Order as <br /> well . <br /> There being no further Commission or public comment, the <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION Elliot Rosenberg made a Motion to continue the <br /> Hearing in this matter to July � , 2001 at 7 : 00 p.m. , at <br /> Applicant ' s request; and ' that an immediate Notice of Violation' <br /> with respect to said property be issued; which Motion was <br /> seconded by- Michael Talbot and so voted unanimously. <br /> 8 : 40 Lawrence Bacon for Determination of Applicability on <br /> relocation of the septic system at Waterway,. Assessors Map <br /> 105, Block 210 . <br /> The Chairman recognized Michael Grotske, representing the <br /> Applicant. He explained the proposal is to abandon the septic <br /> system located at the rear~ of the' house and construct a new <br /> system in -front of the house. The proposed system would be <br /> less than three ft. ) feet to groundwater and approximately <br /> forty 4 o ft . ) feet to the edge of the wetland. <br /> Mr. Grotse requested approval to construct a new 'title <br /> septic system no change in number of bedrooms) at the front of <br /> the house. A- Variance from the Board of Health has been <br /> requested. <br /> -1 - <br />