Laserfiche WebLink
of the Assistant Conservation Agent In this matter. Mr. Patrick <br /> is requesting permission to remove trees which have been scorched <br /> as a result of a brush fire, as he feels they are unsightly. Mr.. <br /> Sherman provided an address, location, and pictures of the area <br /> (Conservation land) . <br /> Both the Conservation/Assistant Conservation Agents agree <br /> the trees should remain as they are to serge as snag habitat. <br /> There is no environmentally sound reason to remove said trees. <br /> The Assistant Conservation Agent is suggesting the <br /> Commission deny said request. <br /> MOTION: Elliot Rosenberg made a Motion to Deny the request <br /> in this ratter- which Motion was seconded by Michael Talbot and <br /> so voted unanimously. <br /> . Course/Plan Reading - Mr. Sherman acknowledged the <br /> availability of said course, explaining however he is uncertain <br /> as to whether or not the Twenty-Five ($25 . 00) Dollar registration <br /> fee would be paid from Conservation funds. <br /> 10 . Mash ee wa} eby Management Committee Newsletter - Mr. <br /> Sherman suggested the Conmission respond to the possible <br /> misinterpretation that the Conservation Commission has authority <br /> to adjust water levels. He explained that National Heritage <br /> cannot be overruled by the Commission. <br /> Mr. Sherman suggested a letter be drafted; the Commission <br /> concurred; Mr. Rosenberg volunteered to assist the Agent. <br /> MOTION- Michael Talbot made a Motion to authorize the <br /> conservation Agent to compose a letter educating the public <br /> regarding procedure to maintain water levels within the Town; <br /> which Motion was seconded by Carole Moore and so voted <br /> unanimously, <br /> 7: Thomas S. Gary to modify and reconstruct two piers and <br /> one float, DBP License #8799,799, along the shore of Great Kiger at <br /> 404 Monor oscoy Toad, Assessors Map 125, Block 256 . <br /> The Chairman recognized Dare sanic) i, Cape Island <br /> Engineering, representing Applicant, who provided a plan. <br /> Mr. Sanicki made references to the existing dock, float and <br /> licensed repaired float. He explained the water levels are low; <br /> Applicant owns a large boat which is currently moored. It is not <br /> possible to cone into the float during low time. <br /> Mr. Sanicki proposed constructing a landing, ramp and float <br /> which would provide access during low tide. The other side of <br /> - the proposed project is to rebuild the existing float, and <br /> constructing stairs to provide a better access. <br /> -4- <br />