Laserfiche WebLink
at, but he hasn't had a chance to look at it. So the two major issues are verification of <br /> the staking and the dune bank delineation. He suspects vire that may need to have <br /> some further input on the written narrative on the methodology and he would like to <br /> refer that to Rebecca Haney to consider because this is a very intense situation in <br /> terms of proximity to resource areas and wetland values. <br /> Bob also distributed to the members letters protesting this project from David F. Foley <br /> P.E. and I laryclare O'Donnell Himmel, and requested that they be part of the minutes. <br /> ,hack said since this is a very complicated project, he'd like to have the issues identified <br /> tonight to minimize the continuances. Bob said verification of the stakes is simple, but <br /> the dune bank delineation is not simple. And once vire agree on the dune/bank <br /> delineation, eve have to look carefully at the performance standards of our By-Law to <br /> see if it violates the significant wildlife habitat value of this dune and bank area, if it <br /> meets our standards of a minimum of 35 ft. setback, and optimum of 50 ft., and if it <br /> meets our standards in terms of impact to wildlife habitat. We can't establish this until <br /> vire know where the dune/bank interface really is. <br /> Mr. trot ke pointed out an existing cottage and said his client will encroach no further <br /> than it or the existing septic system, a dwelling which they have removed, and a new <br /> septic system, which has an existing order of conditions from this Commission. <br /> Michael Talbot said he sees a distance of the coastal bank being 10 ft. and less in <br /> some places. <br /> 5 <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to grant a continuance to February <br /> 27 at 7 p.m. at the request of the applicant. <br /> 7:55 p.m., Anthony P. Gargiulo, 11 ocean Bluff Drive (demolish cottage, construct <br /> single home, including septic system, grading, retaining galls, driveway patios and <br /> landscaping.) Michael Grotke represented the applicant and presented the plan. <br /> Bob said that he and Cass Costa looked at the property last geek and the coastal bank <br /> delineation looked ok from what he saw, but the house stakes and work limits stakes <br /> were not identified. Bob also pointed out an area that needs to be shorn on the plan <br /> There there is a natural grasslands which is valuable habitat that has been mowed and <br /> should not be mowed in the interim. So there are some wildlife habitat impacts that vire <br /> } need to consider in light of our current standards in chapter 172, and he recommended <br /> a continuance. Michael Talbot will join Bob in viewing the site. <br /> Robert Spencer, 7 Ocean Bluff Drive, said 1 he was shocked to find today that <br /> everything Frith the exception of the trees) on the lot net to his has been mored <br /> completely flat to the ground, and 2 he gent to the site today and it looks like the <br /> proposed patio is corning right to the edge of the lot. The plan rooks like the house is <br /> set awfully far forward and this is contrary to what property buyers had been told as to <br />- t t <br />