4/15/2004 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Motion made, seconded and unanimously carded to grant a continuance to May 27 at 7 p.m., at the request of the applicant. A continuance fee will be levied. 7:05 p.m., Richard W. Mark, 45 Santuit Fond (continued from 210 . Dave Sanicki represented the applicant, described the plan, and presented Cion Schall-s study on wildlife habitation In this area. Bob recommended approval. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan. 7:10 p.m., Michael Atwill, 12 Sachem Road (construct porch and gazebo style sitting area). Mr. Atwill presented the plan. Bob recommended approval. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan. 7:15 p.m., Alain Radio,, Waterline Drive North (continued from 411/04). Cass reclused herself from this Dearing. Michael Grotzke represented the applicant and presented the plan. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan pending receipt of the plan sharing the relocated coastal bank and vedtication of it. 7;20 *r ., Nicholas Tagaris, 139 Tide Run (continued from 4/1104). Cass reclused herself from this hearing. Michael Grotzke represented the applicant and presented the plan. Lotion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan pending receipt of the plan shoring the relocated coastal bank and verification of it. 7:25 p.m,., Willow end Glen Condominium Association, Willo wrbend Fond implementation of aquatic vegetation program). Keith Gaallle represented the Association and described the project. Bob said we requested that they file in order to establish if the pond is jurisdictional under this Commission, and it is not. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to record that this project is not jurisdictional under this Commission. 7:30 p.m., Jonathan Yohannan, 304 Redbrook Road (single family home, deck porch, garage, septic, drive ray, utilities and landscaping . Dave Sanicki represented the applicant. Bob stated that we cannot close tonight because we have to wait for Natural Heritage's approval. Mr. Sanicki stated that the parcel is very small and requested a 35 ft. work lima from the BVW. Bob said 1our past precedent in three or four other cases has been that we do not recommend that we go in closer than 50 ft. from the BVW to the work limit, 2 Natural Heritage could present a problem,, 3 he sees a fair amount of wetland vegetatcon above flag 2, so that needs to be clarified, and it might be wise to have a professional wetland scientist redo the line, which we can require on fight lots, and and Bob also opines that certain parts of the slope are shown to be in the flood zone but are indeed coastal bank, and a revised plan showing the coastal bank should be submitted to Natural Heritage. Jac.k suggested that the applicant be more innovative and perhaps eliminate the garage. Bob stated that the architect probably should not do any redesigning until the BVW line is redefined. Motion rade, seconded and unanimously carred to grant a continuance to May 13 at : 10 p.m., at the request of the applicant. 2