Laserfiche WebLink
Motion Made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve a con inuation to May 27 at 7:40 <br /> p.m., at the request of the applicant. It was agreed that they will have to pair a fee for this <br /> confinuatron and any future one, or they can Withdraw the application. <br /> 7:36 p.m.,, Deborah and Johan ne carr, 137 Shore Road (pump and remove cesspools and fill <br /> with sand., install Tibe V, encased water service). Dave Sanicki represented the applicant. Bob <br /> described the plan and recommended approval. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carped to approve the plan. <br /> :40 p.m.,., Richarrd Gray, 1Uncle erc r"s Road (addition, landscaping, grading, patio, septic <br /> and plantings). Michael trot ke represented the applicant and described the plan. The house <br /> as it was constructed has four bedrooms, but the septic system on record appears to list three <br /> bedrooms. Bob said if he goes into the Building Department files and finds that the building <br /> permit listed three bedrooms for the original septic system, the applicant would have to install a <br /> denitrification septic if there are now four bedrooms, unless he can prove the ground water flog <br /> is towards the sound. We could close now pending verification that four bedrooms are legally <br /> permitted, but if only three are now perritted, the applicant would have to open a new filing. <br /> Lotion rade, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan pending venficatron that <br /> the house has four legal bedrooms. <br /> I <br /> 7:45 .m.,Anthony Gargiulo, II Ocean Bluff Drive retaining wall, plantings). Michael trot ke <br /> represented the applicant and described the plan. Lori said she visited the site and didn't see <br /> any problems. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan. <br /> 7.50 p.m., Peter Magliorne, 30 Ockway Bay Road (continued from 4/29/04). John Siavinsk r <br /> represented the applicant. Bob said this was a case occasioned by his giving a certificate of <br /> compliance inspection and turning the owner down because the pool fence was moved out from <br /> pool. We had negotiated to keep the true 50 ft. buffer to the wetland. We had it, and now vire <br /> don't have it, and now he's applying for an amended order for approval of what he did <br /> incorrectly. Bob said he has suggested to Mr. Slavinsky that they walk the property and see if <br /> there is some significant mitigation available�more than the standard formula. <br /> Mr. SIvinskr then described a large dog peri which Mr. Iaglione installed, which was never <br /> shown on the plan. The greatest distance of the pen from the buffer zone is 35 ft. and the pen <br /> is easily 10 times larger than what was shown in the plan. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to demi approval of the peri. <br /> 7:55 p.m., Armando Vicente, 60 Cove Road (continued from 4/29/04). John Slavinsk <br /> represented the applicant and described the plan. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan pending approval of an <br /> appropriate vegetation plan. <br /> .00 .m,, Peter Hinden, 127 Shore Dnve(continued from 4/29104). Bob described the plan <br /> and recommended approval. <br /> 4 <br />