My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/29/2004 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/29/2004 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 5:18:15 PM
Creation date
3/2/2018 2:32:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/29/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br /> He said there was a prior order of conditions for moving some boulders with the condition that <br /> the arrangement would allow for pedestrian traffic. That order of conditions was appealed and i <br /> still pending before DEP. <br /> Tim Cafryn asked, "If l were to build on conservation land, would the Board allover it or would the <br /> Board consider that it was Conservation land that 1 was building on' " Jack said he would have <br /> to file an application and follow all the instructions. Mr. eafl"yn asked, "if 1 were to build on land <br /> with a Conservation easement, would the Board consider the fact that the land had <br /> Conservation easement before giving rine permission to build on It?" He said that the agreement <br /> by which Freddie Blythe considers this his land, but which we know is State land, says in <br /> Section 5 that he's not supposed to build any structures on this lot—it's a Conservation <br /> easement. You as the conservation Board should consider that there is an easement on this <br /> land preventing the building of structures. You may not make a decision as to whether he owns <br /> lana or not, but the agreement says no buildings or structures shall be erected or maintained <br /> thereupon except boardwalks, catwalks and piers and that the easterly lot shall be not used for <br /> a parking lot. That is in what he claims to be his dead, and it's not even a deed, but an <br /> agreement. Its not in Land Court—it's in the Registry of Deeds. His land where his house is in <br /> Land Court, but this agreement is in the registry of Deeds. <br /> In addition, he said he believes the plan is faulty. Each time Mr. Blythe has submitted a plan, <br /> the property lines have changed. The plan for the pier showers the property in the middle of the <br /> way. A more recent pian for the fence shows that the property line has gone over about a third <br /> to the left—it's no longer in the middle, He pointed out the poles for the fence, which he said <br /> Bob Sherman said are on the eigfried's property. On the latest plan submitted after Mr. <br /> Sherman pointed out that he might be on Mr. Zeigfried"s property, the property line Inas gone <br /> completely off the way. <br /> Nancy Caffyn said her concern is wi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.