My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/06/2005 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
01/06/2005 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 5:03:20 PM
Creation date
3/2/2018 2:47:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/06/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> AIASHPEE CONSERVATION COAMMSION <br /> Minutes of January 6,2005 <br /> Public-Hearing <br /> Mashee'town Hall Meeting Room 1 <br /> Comm6sxoners present: .Tack Fitzsimmons, Chainnan, Mchaet Talbot, vice C anl, Len <br /> Pinad, Clerk, Floyd Allen, and mph Shaw. <br /> Staff present: Bob Shennan, Agents and Frances wise, Board Secretary. <br /> Jack Fit sinnnor s, C called the.meet* to order at 6:55 p.nr. <br /> Pu fie Hearing: None. <br /> Non-Hearing Agenda <br /> Old Business: <br /> Motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to send a letter to the Selectmen <br /> 0 <br /> recommending that Je -ey Cross be appointed a�Conumssioner. <br /> 2. RFA., -S43-2288. Bob said this is a request to revise a vita,pruning plan and removal o <br /> sone us x-as trees. He recommended approval. <br /> Motion ode, seconded and unanimously wed to approve RF'AA S #3-2258. <br /> . RFAA-SE-43-2315, Bob said this is'a request for a change in the driveway on the o <br /> plan, He recommended approval. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unannnously carried to approve RFA S -23 i <br /> 4. RFA S3-2144, 75 Popponesset Road. Bob said this is a request for a revised landscape <br /> plan. They have already y made a series of egos for this property, and he does not recommend <br /> approval because they now instead of putting M a pool they want to put in its place a forte <br /> garden, He said his reason for opposing this request is procedural more than anything else-- i.e., <br /> we have too many recantations of landscaping on this prop. He thinks as policy we should <br /> not accept partial landscaping plass, because whoever will be issuing a Certificate o <br /> Compliance will be totally confused. Rather, we should have a plan that reflects the whole <br /> property. As Rebecca Perry says in her letter, the plantings are ornamental and not in keeping <br /> with nafive species that are preferred Om an area lie this. However, Bob said these changes are <br /> within the work limit where we don't normally demand native species, although we would not <br /> approve mvasiv s. Mike said he thinks they should not use the Euonymus Emerald and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.