Laserfiche WebLink
H rin nd <br /> 7:00 p.m., Richard Brady, 2561 lonomoscoy Road (maintain and repair existing concrete bloc} <br /> retain g wall). Steve described the project and recommended.approval. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this RDA. <br /> 7-8,05 p.m., Janet Procek, 12 Great River Road (construct, license and maintain in perpetuity a <br /> ier, ram , float and fender piles). Dave Sanicki and Mar urti , Little River Boatyard, <br /> p p <br /> represented the applicant and described the project. Steve recommended approval. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this N I. <br /> 7:10 .m., Walter and Colette L nkau, 29 Riverside Road (driveway renovations, landscaping, <br /> and lawn). Aran Hajduk represented the applicant and described the project. Michael said that <br /> typically when a proposal is brought before the Commission, the o fl. buffer i identified on the <br /> plan, the resource areas are flagged, and contour lines are shown. He is having trouble figuring <br /> out where the resource areas are and possible impacts. This becomes a plan of record by which <br /> future projects can be adjudged, and Without delineation of the resource areas, it sets a <br /> precedence that leaves open all sorts of interpretations in the future. Also, in exchange for <br /> adding a significant area of fine lawn, he'd like to see a plan to limit mowing the lawn. Steve <br /> suggested asking the applicant to present a new plan that will show the resource areas and <br /> include a maintenance and mitigation plan. <br /> Motion mak, seconded and unanimously carried to grant a continuance t December 14 at <br /> p.m., at the request of the applicant. - <br /> 7:15 p.m.,John Rogers,, Popponesset Island Road (rebuild a wooden retaining wall with <br /> steps). Mark Burtis, Kittle River Boatyard, represented the applicant and described the plan. <br /> Steve recommended approval. . <br /> Motion made, seconded andnanimously carried to approve this RISA. <br /> 7:20 p.m., Robert Bateman, 74 Ninigret Avenue(continued from 11/3/05). Dave Sanicki <br /> represented the applicant and described the new plan. He said he's asking for a 13 ft. variance <br /> from that proposed by the previous plan. Michael said that if they reed to fill this area in order <br /> to meet the variance3r that would be fine with us if they give us a good revegetation plan with <br /> native shrubs along that work limit, so that native vegetation will be reestablished there. Michael <br /> and Steve will-meet with Mr. Sanicki on site to discuss the reVegetation plan. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried.to approve this NI pending receipt of an <br /> approved revegetation plan. <br /> 7:25 p.m., Maury Fiegenbaum, 32 Jehu Pond Road (continued from 11/3/05). Ellis Allen <br /> represented the applicant. Steve described the plan and recommended approval. <br /> 2 <br />