3/16/2006 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

r 7:25 ,m,,David Edlin, 5 Bowsprit Point (continued from 3/2106). David Martin repres rated the applicant and described the plan. Steve recommended approval. Mr. Martin asked about adding maintenance in perpetuity. Steve said they would have to request an amended order o conditions to cover that. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this NOI with the provision that here will be an amended order of conditions.required for maintenance in perpetuity. 7:30 p.m., John Harris, 645 Main Street (continued from 312106). Paula Peters represented the applicant. Steve described the project and recommended approval. Since the project is within o ft. of the buffer zone, we will require some plantings. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this RDA with the understanding that the applicant has agreed to plant some blueberry bushes along the edge of the woods. 7:35 p.m. Christopher Bartoloinei, 34 Pond View Drive (continued from 3/2/06). No one was present to represent the applicant. Steve said the applicant is requesting a fence to protect his child. It was agreed to allow a fence with a m u'u'mum of a 6" gap under the fence, and larger where appropriate, to allow passage for wildlife. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this RDA with the condition that the applicant agree to have a minimum of 6" gap under the fence, and larger where appropriate. 7:40 p.m.,Floyd Thompson, 96 Pimlico Pond Road (continued from 3/2/06). Norman Hayes represented the applicant and described this vista prur ng project. He read a letter from the applicant stating that whatever vista was created by previous tree cutting that was done by others unknown-to them and prior to their purchase Will be abandoned by then in favor of the vista now proposed, and he subn tied the letter for the Files. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this Nod. 7:45 p.m., Jenny McCa# erey, 7 Crow 1a (continued from 3/2/06). Steve said this had been held up due to a technicality with the Board of Health, but everything is now in order, and h recommended approval. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this RDA. 7:50 p.m., Thomas Bele a icz, 53 Pickerel Cove Road (relocate existing retaining wad.and steps, add woody trees and shrubs, and.minor adjustment to the location of existing shed and fence). Ann Hajduk represented the applicant and described the project. Michael said they were using the preexisting retaining wall that has been grandfathered to justify putting in a new wall and lawn within 10 ft. of the resource area, and that's not permitted under our regulations. However, we are allowed to violate our ovenby-laws if we get mitigation of greater value and there is a compelling reason to do so. Lloyd noticed that the location of the existing dock has been changed in the new plan and is now right against the shore. Ms. Hajduk was asked to cone