My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/27/2006 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
4/27/2006 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:20:32 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 10:41:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
rx <br /> I AFCEE update. Steve said the cranberry bogs are being cleaned up. They are trying to solve <br /> the ATV problem as much as we are. They are responsible for maintenance of the roads out <br /> there. They can actually see the light at the end of the tunnel. Peggy Fantozzi is monitoring the <br /> bogs as usual. The feasibility study is in full swing. They are getting all those involved to the <br /> table, saying the end is in sight, and what are we going to d . That Will be crucial for a cost <br /> analysis. <br /> 4. Nitrogen Deposition Conference. Steve said they raised a lot of questions about the impact of + <br /> atmospheric nitrogen in Mashpee. He thinks they put it at 4% of the deposition load. They say it <br /> is close to 12-13%. It can be coning from Ohio, Indiana, the Long Island/New York City area. <br /> Mchael said he's heard 30-40%mentioned. Steve said there was one success story in the <br /> Tampa Bay area. They had a problem in 1975, so they had the whole place sewered. Michael <br /> said that number is 48-50%. Steve said even if Mashpee implemented that right now, we're <br /> looking at 2025 before we see any positive effect. <br /> Michael said that]eased on the Massachusetts estuary studies being done,they had a discussion <br /> concerning impacts from landscaping and storm water runoff, and the number they have been <br /> using for our nitrogen target is probably high. Our regulation gives us the riga to make that <br /> change. We can bring that number down. Beverly Cain said based on what is corning out of the <br /> DEQl rogram, in order to have a positive impact on opponesset and waquoit Bays, that number <br /> is high, and we should be brig it down. Mchael thinks the Regulations Sub-Committee should <br /> take a look at this in the future and talk about whether or not we should be doing that. what <br /> would happen if we would have to do a denite to meet those numbers. <br /> Michael said maybe we would have to specify certain systems that would meet those targets. <br /> Most people want to do the right thing as long as there's an alternative. <br /> 5. Approval of minutes for 3/16/06. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the minutes for 3/16/06. <br /> 6. Blue Ribbon Committee. Steve said John Miller stopped by the office today. Steve wants t <br /> do a short checklist of his ideas to be approved by the Commission regarding establishing a <br /> Nitrogen Committee or a Storm water Committee, which will focus on the nitrogen deposition <br /> issue. Town should consider by-law for nitrogen issue, as well as a committee. <br /> Nfichael said the point he made to the Blue Ribbon Committee was that because we are dealing <br /> with overcoming marketing campaigns and a lack of i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.