Laserfiche WebLink
MASEIPEE CONSERVATION C MMISSIO <br /> Minutes of May 11,2006 <br /> 2oo <br /> Public Hearings <br /> M s pee Town Hall Meeting Room I <br /> Commissioners present: Jack Fitzsinunons, Chairman, Michael Talbot, Vice Chairman, Len <br /> i aud, Clerk, Cass Costa, Jeffrey Cross,-John Rogers and Ralph Shaw. <br /> Staff`present: Drew McManus, Assistant Agent, and Frances Wise,Board Secretary <br /> i hack it sim ons, Chairman called the meeting to order at : p.m. <br /> Public Comment: None. <br /> Non-Hearing Agenda <br /> Old Business. None. <br /> New Business: <br /> 1. R 'AA SE 43-233 51 29 Shoestring.Bay Road, Robert Lurie. Amy Bail.represented the <br /> applicant and described the project. Mchael asked is any opportunity for any vegetation <br /> to be planted that would survive underneath the platform. l&s. Bail thinks there would be. Drew <br /> didn't see any problem.with the project. Michael said we have been trying consistently to <br /> maintain 4 i . docks. 'he or y signs kart change he sees is that originally the stricture was <br /> going to be above the salt marsh, and now it's on the coastal batik, so he is asking for ars <br /> agr went that there be as much revegetation underneath the structure as possible, and that this <br /> be rotated on this administrative approval. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve SE 43-2335 per the above. <br /> 2. RA SE 43-23 591F 3 18 Redbrook Road, Gerry Graves. Drew described the plan and <br /> recommended approval. Although a silt fence is shown on the plan, Michael recommended <br /> putting in a double haybale line or the equivalent to be or the safe side. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve SE 43-2359 with the condition that <br /> i <br /> there be a double haybale, staked silt fence lire instead of a single silt fence sine. <br /> . RFAA SE 43-2414 132 Shore Drive West, Gerald Segal. Drew described the plan. Jack <br /> queried the placement of the walkway, and Drew will check it out. <br /> . DEP File 0 -39 Sea Quarters Condos, Phase 1. Cass stepped down for this hearing. Drew <br /> described the plan. Michael's principal concerm is the erosion potential in the New Seabury area. <br /> He suggested providing some sort of temporary erosion control, and we need to have <br /> n an gemept protocol. Regulation##12 (Nlitigation) states that there has to be a three-year <br /> management plan. The Regulation does not permit replacement of trees and shrubs with season <br />