Laserfiche WebLink
Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve a continuance to December 14th, at <br /> 7 p.m., at the request of the applicant. <br /> 7:03 p.m.,DeAnna Broadley, Shore Drive(remove dangerous overhanging limbs, revegetate <br /> area, install a battered wall for erosion, and replace existing sign at entrance). Tom Jalowy <br /> represented the applicant who is the representative of the bluff. He said he went to the area with <br /> Steve and Drew three or four times. This whole area is extremely dangerous for people walling <br /> Shore Drive to the marketplace because there is no place to step off the road to allow cars to pass <br /> through safely. They would like to create a sidewalk with a stone retainer and remove the <br /> dangerous limbs, and he described the re-vegetation plan. Since this work is in the flood zone, <br /> Steve asked what the pitch of the wall would be. Mr. Jalowy said approximately a 25-degree <br /> angle. Steve said the area could use vegetation enhancement, the project meets all the <br /> performance standards, and he recommended approval. <br /> Jack asked what the interaction of this proposal was with the proposed carriage house on the <br /> other side. Steve said all they have to do is show representation. This is being brought forth by <br /> the association, so the requisite interest is there because obviously everybody within the <br /> association applied(at least he hopes so). <br /> Ms. Broadley said eight out of the ten owners who were asked to approve the project voted yes. <br /> Two didn't say no—they just didn't say anything. Steve said he would qualify that as requisite <br /> interest. If it comes to the point in a later filing when we have to interact with that, he will meet <br /> on the site with them and figure out what is to be done. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this NOI. <br /> 7:06 p.m., Michael Nadzeika,90 Shore Drive West, Building A(demolish and rebuild a <br /> condominium unit, paved driveway, utilities, and patio). John Slavinsky represented the <br /> applicant and described the project. Steve said regarding the patio, there is no room for plant <br /> mitigation. Mr. Slavinsky withdrew the patio on this application, and he made a note on the plan <br /> accordingly. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this NOI, with the exclusion of the <br /> patio. <br /> 7:09 p.m.,Robert and Syrul Lurie,29 Shoestring Bay Road (vista pruning). Amy Ball <br /> represented the applicants and described the plan. Steve said if there is a dock there, part of the <br /> vista corridor has to encompass it. This corridor only has to be as wide as the dock, and would <br /> be taken off the 39 ft. requested. <br /> Jack asked about the shape of the vista corridor(trapezoidal). Steve said the waterside is 100% <br /> and the landward side is 80%. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve this NOI. <br /> 7:12 p.m.,Robert and Stephanie Spencer, 7 Ocean Bluff Drive(remove existing wall and <br /> construct and maintain a proposed carriage house with landscaping and restoration per <br /> landscaping plan). Cass left the meeting for this hearing and the remainder of the meeting. John <br /> 2 <br />