Laserfiche WebLink
Jeff asked if AmeriCorps works with schools on projects. Mr. Jordan said they are always <br /> interested that. They usually partner with someone from the school who will supervise the <br /> students. AmeriCorps merely provides the education, tools, safety equipment and the <br /> opportunity. High school kids usually only want 10 work 4 hours a day, whereas they usually put <br /> in an 8 112 hour day. Jed said some students are fished with classes at noon but for some <br /> reason they stay in school until 5 p.m. He feels they would be better off working outside with <br /> group like AmeriCorps. Mr. Jordan said if their teachers feel that way, he'd be happy to have the <br /> students' help. <br /> Lloyd asked if they could help with a darn. Mr. Jordan said they are not structural engineers, but <br /> they can work with any partner who has a plan but just reds the muscle. They can drop trees, <br /> groom trails, and remove trash, but he doesn't know if they could do anything with dam. <br /> - <br /> 3. Approval of minutes for 12/14/06. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the minutes for 1.2114106. <br /> 4. Blue Ribbon Committee. Jack said the next meeting will be on January 18th and he pis to <br /> attend it. He assumes they will have another meeting to weeks after that. We wiH discuss at <br /> our meeting on January 25th who wiU attend the following Blue Ribbon Committee meeting. <br /> Hearing Agenda: <br /> 7:00 p.m.,Edwina Brooke-Petit, 131 Timberlane Drive(demolish and rebuild existing <br /> dwehing on sarne foundation with associated appurtenances). Timothy Bennett represented the <br /> applicant and described the project. He said a previous contractor began working on a <br /> significant remodeling and his work was found to be substandard, not up to code, so the entire <br /> structure is to be torn down and reconstructed. The applicant now wants to add a deck. She <br /> believes there was once a deck*n one corner. However, there are no photographs or posts as <br /> evidence that there was such a deck other than a door there that sups down 3 i . The major issue <br /> is an overhanging deck that is newly constructed and is already pulling away from the house. <br /> The plan is to remove the existing brick piers and posts and put in sone tube holes and standard <br /> wood posts. <br /> Since they fled this application, they found that the image is also rotted, so they would like to <br /> include in the.application reconstructing the game, whether it be jacking it up or taking it down <br /> to the foundation. <br /> Drew said the ung is taking the existing footprint with the addition of the deck, which will go <br /> into an area that is already disturbed where the lawn used to be, so he and Steve don't see any <br /> problem. It's an RDA Ming because it's taking the same footprint that already exists from the <br /> old house. They are adding a deck but there is no cieafing involved, so itwon't disturb anything. <br /> ,Zack asked if this shouldn't be a Notice of Intent, and how we distinguish between an NOI and <br /> an RDA. Drew said what separates there is with the exception of the deck,they are using the <br /> same footprint, so there"s no new construction going into the buffer zone and no disturbance <br /> going into the resource areas. <br /> 2 <br />