My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/8/2007 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
2/8/2007 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:15:13 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 11:11:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/08/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The amount of excavation that is within the buffer zone is also increased by virtue of the fact that <br /> this -inch duct and water line has to be excavated and relocated 5 feet deep within the travel <br /> area. <br /> The engineer spoke to the number of trees to be cut as nine. Nr. Wall believes there will be'one <br /> more tree by the pole, maybe two. That's not a cause for argument. What should be a cause for <br /> discussion is that it's been represented to the Con n fission tonight that there will be seven trees <br /> planted. where? There is nothing that shows where that mitigation is being proposed. And yet, <br /> the mitigation plan shows a 550 square foot footprint. But the foundation is in there. The plan <br /> does now shove where the trees are going to be planted and what size. It is not the finest <br /> mitigation plan that's ever been provided to this conumssion or any commission. <br /> More importantly with respect to this mitigation area, he calculates something less than the <br /> engineer did. eve"re talking about an area hat's already vegetated, as shown in the photos he <br /> presented this evening. He disagrees with Brad of es's statement that it is only 25% <br /> vegetated, that it's sparsely vegetated. He believes that it's vegetated to a much greater degree. <br /> Since it is vegetated, it's inappropriate to take credit for 3,500 sq. ft. or 2,486.25 sq. ft. when the <br /> area is already vegetated. How can you mitigate and take credit for an area that's already <br /> vegetated? <br /> Mr. Holmes provided information relative to rare species that have been found to ut i e areas <br /> such as this, which is general delineation. It was reported to be rose tern and common tern. Pipe <br /> and plover might utilize this also, but what they use is areas that are more open, not more <br /> vegetated. Natural Heritage will respond back to Messrs. Spencer and Hohnes as to what they <br /> feel maybe appropriate under the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act, not the review that <br /> was done under the submission of the Notice of Intent to Natural Heritage. what Mr. Holmes <br /> presents to the onum*s ion in thi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.