9/20/2007 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

i Hearing A-gena= i 7:00 p.m. Nicholas Bucky,.Jr. RDA—8 Suri mersea kd (install 8,3 x 12"shed) Ir. Nicholas#ducky, .Jr(applicant)described the project. He explained that he wishes to erect an 8'x 121 shed on his property for storage purposes. The agent did complete an on-site and stated that the shed is on the lawn and slopes down to vegetated wetlands. He did speak with Mr. lucky about installing plantings from the Conservation list of approved plantings around the area. Mr. Bucky did agree to said plantings. The commission further recommended that neither gasoline nor oil be stored in the shed due to spilltrnsfer concerns. 4 Motion rade, seconded and unanimously carried for a negative determination. 7:03 p.m. Town I ashpee DPW, ICDA—Cayuga Avenue Toad Layout (Mix existing pavement with subsurface soils and install leach pits to reduce drainage) The agent described that the work is in the read layout only, and thus he saw no imps t.to the resource area cataquin Pond) abutting the work area and recommended approval. Dation made,seconded and unanimously carried for a negative determination. 7:06 p.m. Richard Lawless, ICDA— 161 Daniels Island Rd (Repair and replace To ed pier and floats) Marls Burtis(contractor) representing the applicant described the applicant's Trish to rehab their older dock with new materials. The dock will stag in the same f otprint and will have the same diameter poles, but the poles will be dug deeper than they are currently. There is no power to the dock currently, so there are no power issues created by this rehab. The agent said the project meets the performance standards for docks and recommended approval. Motion Trude, seconded and unanimously carried for a negative determination* p.m. Bogert White O'Leary Trustee, Idol�-16 Tuspacluin Rd (Goat. from 09/06/2007) .John Slavinsky of cape and Islands Engineering representing the applicant described their wish to install a.portable, seasonal dock. He did explain that there was a dock there som' a years ago and that he saw no vegetation issues. Mr. 81avinsky also stated that they had filed with National Heritage and that they had four more days to answer. Mrs. Kelly O'Leary Richenburg (applicant) explained the project originally was to be a two family dock. She said that it is no longer going to be two family as the neighbors could not agree on the liability of each party. Mrs. l ichenburg had drafted a license agreement as well, but the neighbors were not satisfied, as the dock would not be registered on their land. The agent relayed that the Harbormaster has not signed off on this project as he feels that they are too close to the neighbor's moorings. The lot line is in question, as It appears that there is not enough room to install a dock, and there is question a to fro owns the beach property. The current plans are not char, and the issues with the neighbor and Harbormaster need to be resolved prior to approval. The agent recommended mended continuance until the issues can be resolved. Motion trade, seconded and unanimously carried for a continuance until 10/04/07 a@ 7:24 p.m. 7:12 .,m. Michael and Judith Welch!,AOC—277 Monomoscoy Rd (landscape plan) .Jack Lander-Cauley(contractor) representing the applicants explained their need to amend their existing outer previously approved by the conservation commission. He did.show the commission proof of mailing for the abutter notices from the post office. He did mail all of the letters out but did not get the green certification card back on one. The applicants wish to-landscape between the house and shoreline and along the easterly line of the property. The landscape plan includes removal of 0 of the lawn and installation of a fire pit. Mr. Peter Harrington attomey for Mr. Frederick camerato, an abutter to the property, expressed some concems with the worts at Mr. Welch's. His client is concerned with the wall being built on the property and the drainage issue that is being created. The drainage issue directly 2