Laserfiche WebLink
procedures. The Agent explained that he did understand her frustration but that the hearing rust be kept <br /> to the wall issue only. Commissioner costa responded to Ms. Dineen and stated that she understood that <br /> she was upset; she suggested that if res. Dineen was experiencing s run off issue as stated at the last <br /> hearing she should follow up with the proper agencies(Building Department, ZBA or court system if <br /> necessary). The Commissioner also explained that though Mr. Stow has not followed procedure and it <br /> should not be considered precedence for others. She felt most other townspeople were considerate of <br /> their neighbors and followed proper procedure. Mr. Albert Lawton stood to make an abutter comment. He <br /> did try to present photos not pertaining to the hearing and was asked to stick to the topic at hand. He <br /> stated that he had nothing further in regards to the wall. The Agent recommended a negative <br /> determination. <br /> Motion made,seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination. <br /> 7:18 p.m..Martin and Betsy Solomon, RDA A—1 opp nessett Island rid <br /> (Remove ove existing deck and lattice and replace with new screen porch in existing footprint with the <br /> addition of one sonatue. <br /> Diane stood to represent the applicants. She explained with the help of the Agent than the applicants <br /> wished to replace an existing deck with lattice and replace it with new screen porch with the addition of <br /> one son to e. The Agent explained to the Commission that the area is disturbed, and there is no impact <br /> that he can see with this project as It is in the sane footprint. The Agent recommended a negative <br /> determination. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative ative Deterrrnina i n. <br /> Fleeting adjourned at 8:52 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Melissa Brown <br /> Board Secretary <br />