My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/12/2008 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
6/12/2008 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:25:00 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 12:57:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/12/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r - <br /> #r <br /> backyard and put in place three drainage pipes to pipe the run off to the wetlands. The Agent stated that <br /> the pipes needed to be removed as part of this RDA and would be conditioned in the approval. Mr,Joe <br /> agreed that the pipes would be removed, as they are no longer necessary. Mr. ,Joe also explained that as <br /> part of this filing he was looking to get some landscaping approved. Mr. Joe stated that he was looking to <br /> replace the lawn and put in the area about 10 yards of sand fill. Mr. Joe explained that he Intends to use <br /> a Conservation area mix product and found an organic fertilizer to use as well with it.The Agent <br /> explained that fertilizer use in the area is not recommended as it would wash into the wetlands and <br /> possibly compromise the health of the plants there. The Agent explained to the Commission that the area <br /> is dose to the wetlands(isolated land subject to flooding) and possibly could be a vernal pool. Mr. ,toe <br /> agreed to find a mix that does not require any fertilizer. Mr.Joe explained that he would also like to plant <br /> 7 Leland Cypress trees as a noise buffer on the property. The Agent explained that there was a shed <br /> installed on the property that also was not permitted-but that it was prefab and no digging occurred to <br /> erect it.The Agent and Mr.Joe explained that it is on the upland portion of theroperty and outside of the <br /> wetlands. The Agent recommended a negative determination, he also started that he would monitor the <br /> project and make sure that the bottles are big enough to handle the gutter run off. <br /> Motion made,seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Deterrnination w th the condition <br /> that the drainpipes are removed and that the gutter runoff bottles are monitored. <br /> 7:03 Kathleen and Michael Bowler, NOI—37 Birch Way <br /> (Continued from o 01/0 Pier, float) <br /> The Agent explained that the applicants had requested a continuance. The Commission asked why this <br /> would be the fourth continuance for this filing. The Agent explained that Natural Heritage is requiring the <br /> applicants have a freshwater mussel surrey dome prior to any approval from their office.The Agent stated <br /> that the matter appears that it will be completed by next hearing. <br /> Motion made,seconded and unanimously carrried for a continuance until 08128/2008 @ 7:03 p.m. <br /> 7,06 p.m. Kathleen and Brown Lingar ,elter, l of--65 sec rn ett Point Road <br /> (Demolish and rebuild garage with slight increase In footprint) <br /> Michael Borselli of Falmouth Engineering shod to represent the applicants. Mr. Borselli explained that the <br /> hearing Was continued so that Natural Heritage and,IAMBI IA could be heard from regarding the project. We <br /> explained that the letter had been received by bath himself and the Conservation Department.Mr.Borrelli <br /> explained that neither party had any Issues and that the property is not a priority habitat. Mr. Borrelli also <br /> j explained that the Commission and-Agent had questioned the use of the overflow storage in the garage. <br /> He explained that there would be no bedroom or playroom area and that no plumbing will be in place. { <br /> j Commissioner 1=ftz simmons read for the record a letter from the Board of Health stating that no <br /> application review was necessary. The commission asked if a plan was required with the application.The <br /> Agent explained that it was not required and he recommended approval. <br /> Motion made,seconded and unanimously carried to Close and Issue. <br /> 7:09 p.m. David Rose, of— 184 Rock Landing Road <br /> Frnoe railed ties, new patio arra rock wall in se footprint and landscaping) <br /> The Agent explained that the applicant had requested a continuance, as there has not been a D.E.P <br /> number issued yet on the application. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a continuance until 0612612008 @ :18 pain. <br /> 7:12 p.m. Patricia cern ille, RDA—20 Wilson"s Grove(septic upgrade) <br /> Peter McAfee from Engineering Works stood to represent the applicant.The Agent explained that the <br /> application is straightforward:the septic is located in flood zone but not near wetlands.The Agent <br /> i explained that he has no issues with the project. Commissioner Fitzsimmons read for the record a letter <br /> from the Board of health letter stating that the application has been approved. <br /> Motion anode, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination. <br /> MR 15 P.m.William Carleton, RDA—19 Bowsprit Point(septic upgrade) <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.