My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/10/2008 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/10/2008 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:25:49 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 12:58:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> (To maintain in perpetuity the pier~, ramp and'float) (Cass Costa recuses herself) <br /> (Asst. Commissioner Cobert Anderson is appointed to vote by Commissioner Fitzsimmons) <br /> Stan Clyde stood to represent the applicants.,The Agent explained that applicants had been before the <br /> Commission previously to install the pier, ramp and float but had not included maintenance and perpetuity <br /> in the application. The Agent also explained that he had spoken with Mr. Hyde and explained that any <br /> repair over 10% or larger than just replacing boards and general maintenance would require another <br /> filing. <br /> Lotion made, seconded and unanimously carried toApprove the Amended order of Conditions* <br /> 7:06 p.m. Evan and,Susan Rangel, lot—762 Cotuit Hoed <br /> (Continued-from o o (Demolish.and rebuild new single family home with decks, driveway,, <br /> landscaping,embankment restoration,stairway replacement and associated appurtenances) <br /> John Slavinsky of Cape and Islands Engineering stood to represent the applicants. Mr. Slavinsky. <br /> explained that the applicants originally were unsure as to whether they would remodel or rebuild the <br /> house at the northern end of Mashp a Wakeby pond. Mr. Slavinsky explained that they had decided on <br /> the rebuild and that the house be setback further on the property,the current house sits 19'from the BVW <br /> line and the new plan has it sitting 2 'from the BVW line. M'r. Slavinsl y explained that they would be <br />! <br /> removing stairwell and replacing it with an elevated stairway in the same location. Mr. Slavinsky <br /> explained that the septic is being inspected but that it is a fairly new system; Commissioner Fitzsimmons <br /> read a letter from the Board of Health.that the application is on file. Michael Talbot of Michael Talbot and <br /> Associates stood to explain the mitigation plan including the use of rain gardens to help.control run off. <br /> Mr. Talbot explained that the property is currently mostly a wooded lot with turf and trees with severe <br /> defects. Mr. Talbot explained that the plan calls for the removal of the defective trees and revegetation of <br /> the area. Mr. Talbot also explained that the leaves pile will be removed from the beach and that area will <br /> be restored'. The Agent explained that he was contacted by the Zoning Board of Appeals and that they <br /> had asked that the setbacks be questioned. The Agent stated that he had also questioned the setbacks <br /> and wondered why the house could not be moved any further back from the BVW tine. The Agent <br /> questioned whether all the tagged trees would have to be removed if the house was moved farther back. <br /> i Ir. Talbot explained that even if the house is rrioved back that the trees should be removed due to <br /> cavities at their bases, and the trees could pose a danger to the house in a storm. The Agent asked,if <br /> other locations had been explored and stated that he felt the bank would be compromised in the <br /> construction in its proposed location. The representatives stated that they were taking into consideration <br /> the effect and that is why more mitigation was proposed. The Agent stated that he would be happy to go <br /> on site with Mr. Slavinsky and explore other options. The representatives asked for a two-week <br /> continuance. The Agent informed Mr. Slavinsky that the applicants would be receiving a violation notice <br /> on their dock, as it is unpermi#ted. - <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a continuance until 07/2412008 @ 7:12 p.m. <br /> 7409 P,m. David Rose, l of—1 4 Rock Landing road <br /> (Continued from 1 1 )(Rem ve railroad ties, new patio and rock wall in some footprint and <br /> landscaping) <br /> Brian Casey stood to represent the applicant. Mr. Casey explained that the applicant has fire small <br /> projects that make up this application. lir. Casey explained that the first consisted,of removal of some <br /> invasive hedges. Mr. Casey explained that the second.project of the application is to remove a plywood <br /> gall and replace it with a rock wall. Mr. Casey explained that the third project is to create a turnaround <br /> driveway to ease entry onto the imam road. Mr. Casey explained that the new section of driveway would <br /> be blended into the old and that the space for it is already cut in for the most part. The fourth project Mr. <br /> Casey explained is to remove the.old creosote railroad ties and within the same footprint construct a new <br /> rook wail. The last project Mr. Casey explained would be replacing the current stone patio with a broken <br /> blue stone patio and remove an oak tree that is close to the house-in that Area. Mr. Casey explained that <br /> the application also includes installing a pervious walkway to deck and removal of the in asives on the <br /> property, replacing therm with Eastern Iced Cedars and lnkberry. Elizabeth mentioned.that the wetland <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.