Laserfiche WebLink
Slavinsky explained that the new plan also includes a walkway that stops 5 feet from the property line <br /> down to the beach. The Commission questioned who owned the beach and "paper road {Overland Rd <br /> on the plan. Mr. Slavinsky explained that the applicant does not currently own the property but that it is on <br /> the market, and.they are attempting to purchase it. Commissioner Fitzsimmons asked why the applicant <br /> would add a walkway when the current owner could say that Mr. costill is not allowed access, in essence <br /> a walkway to nowhere. Mr. Slavinsky agreed and stated that there would not be a problem in removing <br /> the walkway from the project as they could add it again in the future should the applicant be able to <br /> purchase the rand. The Assistant Agent explained that the new location/reduction in size is much better <br /> but that there needs to be more erosion controls added, specifically to the beach side and near the cEe <br /> line. Commissioner Pinaud questioned the setbacks for the boathouse as the plan showed only a -foot <br /> setback. Mr. Slavinsky explained that he had gone to the Zoning Board of Appeals informally and they will <br /> w► <br /> have to allow the applicant a variance to get it approved. He stated that they had asked hire to add a <br /> doable row of hay bales. Mr.'Slavinsky explained that he will have to go back to them after this bearing, <br /> and they will make their official determination. The Commission asked,about Natural Heritage and any <br /> D.B.P comments received.The Assistant Agent explained that Natural Heritage's comments were that the <br /> proposed project did not result in a stake" so as far as they are concerned would not be an issue. The <br /> Assistant Agent stated that the D. .P questibned only if the boathouse needed to be made of flood <br /> resistant construction. Mr. Slavinsky stated that he did not feel that boathouses were subject to those <br /> requirements and had contacted the D.F.P about it. The Assistant Agent asked about the construction, <br /> methodology and, access. Ir. Slavinsky stated that the construction would be done by bobcat and <br /> access w old be from the road. He explained that the foundation would be trade of sotto tubes and not <br /> dug like for other structures. The Commission questioned tree removal on the property based on the <br /> pictures. Mr. Slavinsky stated that there would-be no tree removal at all. The Assistant Agent stated that <br /> the Order of conditions would be written to include a condition that no boats are to be dragged over the <br /> bank at all. Mr. Slavinsky agreed and stated that the boat currently on the beach that was dragged over <br /> the bank was not the applicants, as they understand that it is not allowed. <br /> Motion rade,seconded and unanimously carried to close and Issue with the condition that n <br /> trees be removed and no buts be dragged over the bank. <br /> 7:03 Michael chi sson# RDA—41 Lakeview Dr. . <br /> (Enclose area beneath deck) <br /> Barbara Frappier of Warwick and Associates stood to represent the applicant. ibis. Frappier described the <br /> applicants wish to enclose an area beneath his deck for storage. ll . Frappier explained that it would be. <br /> made of wooden walls with nb windows and a door, possibly.even double doors and used to sure the <br /> applicant's things. The Assistant Agent asked how many sono tubes would be involved; lis. Frappier <br /> stated that she was not sure.The Assistant Agent asked that a siltation barrier be installed between the <br /> land and work area. Ms. Frappier stated that they would add a siltation fence on the landward side of the <br /> existing concrete wall. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a legative Determination. <br /> 7:06 p.m.William Daniels,, RDA—4 Ned Besse Road <br /> (Install a split rail fence and plant hostas along-fence) <br /> Mr. Daniels stood to represent himself. Mr. Daniels described his wish to install a split rail.fence for safety <br /> reasons and add some plantings along.it as mitigation. Mr. Daniels stated that he feels the neighbor's dog <br /> is a nuisance and.is a danger to those on his property. He cited an event where the dog broke free frofn <br /> his chain and chased Mr. Da'niefs all.around his yard. The Asst, Agent and Mr. Daniels explained that Mr. <br /> Daniels had started work on the fere but had stopped to consult Conservation after being told by a <br /> neighbor that he needed to do so. The Assistant Agent explained that the fere does not appear to <br /> impact the bank, and she would recommend a negative determination. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination. <br /> 2 <br />