Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> *r <br /> remove the overgrown nuisance species and removal of three trees. Mr. Tavares explained that the new <br /> landscape plan would also include adding a shrub layer and reseeding the lawn in the area. Mr. Tavares <br /> also explained that the existing p Oe tri n way would be reinforced but there would be no major <br /> topographical ranges. The Agent questioned the driveway and whether it world stay pervious gravel <br /> when extended; Mr. Tavares stated that it would remain gravel with a concrete apron. The Assistant <br /> Agent asked that hay bales and silt fence.be added for erosion controls at the limit of work. The Agent <br /> also asked the C .E.P number be reposted as it looks to have fallen down on the site. Mr. Tavares agreed <br /> to both the erosion controls and to repost the D.E.P as soon as possible. <br /> Motion n made, seconded and unanimously carried to Approve the Amended Order of Conditions <br /> pending that hay bales and silt fence be added for erosion controls at the limit of work. <br /> 7:12 p.m. Michael Welch,AOC—277 Monom sc y Ind <br /> (changes to landscape plan) <br /> The applicant requested a two week continuance until 08/21/2008 @ 7-12 p.m. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a continuance until 05/2112008 a@ 7:12 p.m. <br /> 7:15 p.m. Deryk Eynon, RDA—17 F irneny Way <br /> (Demolish and reconstruct a deck) <br /> Deryk Eynon stood to represent himself and explained that he had demolished'his deck as it was unsafe <br /> and would like permission to rebuild it within the same footprint and on the salve sono tubes. Mr. Eynon <br /> did explain that he would like to cantilever it out two feet to increase.the size. The Assistant Agent asked <br /> that erosion controls be installed at the limit of work. Mr. Eynon asked what type of controls to 'install;the <br /> Agent explained that a silt fence staked and toed in would be fine. The Agent recommended a negative <br /> determination. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination pending a silt <br /> fence be staked and toed in. <br /> 7:15 p.m. DaVid Keene,, Aoc—63.lames circle <br /> (Add 30 ft to the work limit, 30 ft to the wall on one side, eliminate good stairs and replace with <br /> same materials as lull <br /> Dike Cannata stood to represent the applicant. Mr. Cannata described the applicants wish to extend the <br /> previously approved wall ars additional 30 feet and replace an existing unsafe staircase. Mr. Cannata also <br /> explained that the applicant would like to remove the sluiceway currently on the property near the <br /> stairway. The Agent and Commission questioned what trees would be removed to accomplish the new <br /> changes.Mr. Cannata explained that some trees would need to be removed to extend the wall;the <br /> Commission stated that they were not listed on the plan. Mr. Cannata-agreed and stated that they can be <br /> added to the plan;the Commission also requested the quantities of plants for the mitigation be added to <br /> the plan. The Agent also requested the drain pipe leading to the sluiceway be removed as soon as <br /> possible. Mr. Cannata explained that-thetipipe would be removed and stuffed into a dr Drell. The <br /> Commission stated that they felt a continuance was in order so that a new plan could be provided. Mr. <br /> Cannata agreed and asked for a two 'week continuance. The Agent agreed and also let Mr. Cannata <br /> know that the project can be approved in the future but that the applicant has outstanding property taxes <br /> that need to be paid before any work can begun. Mr. Cannata stated that.he would relay the message to <br /> the applicant. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a continuance until 08121/2008 @ 7:30 p.m. <br /> 7:21 p.m. Susan Williams, RDA—252 I on rn sc y Rd <br /> (Demolish and rebuild deck within same footprint) <br /> Susan Williams-stood to represent herself on her application. Ms. Williams described her wish to demolish <br /> and rebuild her existing deck. Ms. Williams explained that the deck is failing apart and that it is really <br /> unsafe and none of the contractors she had came out to give her an estimate would even go on the deck <br /> 3 <br /> f <br />