My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/24/2012 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
5/24/2012 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:22:38 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 1:13:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/24/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Agent McManus would like to comment on the documentation from LEC, specifically the <br /> calculations and determination of the maximum wave-that could do damage which states the impact <br /> on a vertical wall and pressure from linear foot on cages that are stacked too high and that it should <br /> be taken into account that the sold surface will be doubled and the potential impact of gave erosion <br /> around the cages will be increased. The agent states that the terms "vertical wall:' and is <br /> surf=ace„ are riot applicable to the structures proposed because they are flow through cages and - <br /> associarted anchoring devices. There are no vertical walls and the cages are not considered solid <br /> surfaces as they allover for the flow through circulation of water. <br /> Agent McManus says that providing more information in the narrative as requested would not only <br /> help the Commission make an-informed decision but also being able to accurately draft up an order, <br /> of Conditions that will safe guard and alleviate concerns. <br /> Agent McManus comments on information that Ms. Buretos submitted. Ms. Buretos. points out that <br /> identification of an anal romous catadromous fish run by the Division of Marine Fisheries and the <br /> proposed project may be a significant barrier for the species as they travel in and out of the in <br /> The agent states that the Division of Marine Fisheries deers that this is an acceptable project <br /> based on a number of criteria that they look at and that it does meet their performance standards <br /> based on 310 CII 10.35 S-3A. <br /> Chairman Fitzsimmons asks for a date and time for the continuance. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to continue to .June 14, 2012 at : gprn <br /> Chairman Fitzsimmons asks Mr. York if he can provide the documentation that he mentioned earlier <br /> and Mr. York says that he can send it over. The documentation shows that It increases species <br /> diversity and they provide more food for all finds of organisms. He states that one paper from the <br /> Audubon Society had created an oyster reef in vellfleet solely for the purpose of creating a <br /> sanctuary of an improved habitat for all kinds organisms including birds. <br /> 7,03 Feta Connolly Kearse Road) Replace existing septic system with a Title V. Existing <br /> cesspool will be pumped, filled with clean sand and eb'and ned - RDA <br /> Resource,area: LSCSF <br /> Material submitted. Proposed Septic System 517112 Engineering forks <br /> [1: 36 Pete McEntee of Engineering Works is presenting for Ms. Connolly and he explains that <br /> the owners are requesting to voluntarily upgrade their septic system. Agent McManus states that <br /> the area disturbed will be replaced with loam and seed. Three variances were requested by the <br /> Burd of Health. The argent recommends the conservation seed mix for ground cover. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a legative Determination <br /> 7:06 John Foley (184 M n m s Road) Remove ve existing deck and replace with a larger deck- <br /> RDA _ ;`ontr nic vi ' 0, 2012** <br /> Resource Area. LSCSF,, Buffer Zone to Salt MarshV <br /> Material submitted. Proposed Deck 3116/12 BSS Design <br /> [-1:21:301 Jeff F yther from BSS Design is representing for the applicant and explains that the deck <br /> proposal will extend along the back of the house. The original deck was approved in 1987 by a <br /> k <br /> separate application which a note was found in the file and approved by Bob Sherman. Agent <br /> McManus confirms that a document-was found in the file that gives the specs of the deck and must <br /> have been presented to the Commission in some fashion. The agent states.that the newly revised <br /> plan submitted for the deck replacement shows the placement of the sonotubes. He also states <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.