Laserfiche WebLink
Vaccaro is asking for ar waiver from Regulation 29 and has calculated out the mitigation requirement for a <br /> total of about 40f but they will provide over 6300sf of mitigation. <br /> Agent McManus states that there is a difference between mitigation and landscape. The plan presented <br /> a <br /> is more of a landscape format and it does state in the regulation for a naturally vegetated buffer strip that <br /> when mitigation is put in place, it should be to recapitulate the contiguous nature of the buffer strip. The <br /> agent states that looking at the landscape plan and the crisscross sandy pathways; he feels that it-is not <br /> in line with proper mitigation. He recommends the plan to be re-drawn to show an enhancement to the <br /> buffer and eliminating the pathways, except the one to the boathouse. Mr. Gurnee asks where the <br /> mitigation area is versus the existing landscaped shrubbery a.nd trees. Mr. Vaccaro states that there is a <br /> i <br /> brush lire and also pockets in the vegetated areas that will be enhanced. <br /> Mr. Allen asks about the 12' water which is inevitable in this area and what precautions have been taken <br /> with the proposed boathouse. Mr. John Slavinski with cape & Islands Engineering explains than the <br /> boathouse is a slab on grade and will be supported by a system of piers below ground such as the <br /> existing garage. Mr. Alien asks about the breakaway sections and Mr. Slavinski states that there will be <br /> multiple breakaway sections because they are in-the velocity zone. <br /> Chairman Fitzsimmons states that he finds it difficult to support the application as there are-no compelling <br /> reasons for waivers for the additions. The addition is 11' from the coastal bank and on the other side is a <br /> large proposed porch that is 1 o' from the coastal bank. The large boathouse is within ' of the resource <br /> area. The by law was written specifically for compelling reasons and the Chairman states that he does <br /> not see it. He recommends possibly putting the boathouse on the other side and to plane the Title <br /> system further down. Mr. Slavinski states that there is no place else the Title 5 can go. He states that <br /> there are two cesspools sitting in about a foot and half of water and they will be putting in a HOOT <br /> system which will reduce the nitrogen and phosphorous along with a UV light. They will also move the <br /> osprey nest because it is sitting too close to the electric lanes; one was even electrocuted recently. Mr. <br /> Slavinski says that they will be willing to remove the proposed addition and possibly reduce the size of <br /> the porch. Mr. Sweet asks if the boathouse can be moved closer to the road. Mr. Slavinski states that <br /> the owners will not want to revise the boathouse location. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to Deny the Notice of Intent <br /> 7:15 ,James Ryder a shore Drive) Replace existing septic tank and install a new Title 5 sewage <br /> disposal system. Existing leaching pit will be pumped dry, disconnected and filled with clean <br /> sand or removed - RDA <br /> Resource Area: Buffer Zone to Coastal Bankl BVW1 LSCSF <br /> Material submitted: Sewage Disposal system Repair 5111112 Christopher Costa &Associates <br /> [53-21 Matt costa from Christopher costa &Associates is-presenting for the homeowners and explains <br /> that the dwelling has been operating on a failed septic system and would like to install a new Title 5 leach <br /> field and tank. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination <br /> 7:18 Mary occhi g Ockway Bay Road) construct a single family dwelling with attached garage, porch, <br /> patios, in-ground pool with fence enclosure, vista corridor and also to construct and maintain a <br /> landing, stairs, pier, ramp &float system i N01 <br /> Resource Area: Land Under Ocean, LSCS ., Salt Marsh, Coastal Bark, Buffer to Coastal Bank <br /> Material submitted, Site Design Plan 5117117 Christopher Costa &Associates <br /> [56,301Matt Costa from Christopher costa & Associates is presenting for the homeowners and they are <br /> proposing a single family dowelling which a portion of the dwelling straddles the 00' buffer from the <br /> coastal bank. Also proposed is ar pool, patio and associated landscaping for the structure which falls <br /> within the '-100' buffer. Mr. Costa states that they have Kept all structures ' from the top of the <br /> 6 <br />