My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/12/2012 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/12/2012 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:26:58 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 1:14:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Colasuonno confirms that now with the spacing between the poles, nourishment placed behind the <br /> piles will dissipate,between the poles as it was supposed to do. The Chairman asks if there is any way <br /> to calculate if the spacing is accurate to allow the sand to dissipate between the poles. Agent <br /> McManus responds that the-project was never given a chance to perform so it may be premature t <br /> make any kind of speculation of how it will operate. <br /> Mr. Colasuonno states that another issue is the-tinning of the nourishment; in the past, they would <br /> nourish late fall to anticipate fall storms to protect the embankment. They are concerned about putting <br /> the nourishment out too soon and by the time the storms come, the nourishment would be gone. The <br /> nourishment i -provided to create a beach but it is also to protect the bank. Mr. Fogel states that a <br /> condition that was put in both Orders was to direct each land owner to coordinate the beach <br /> nourishment and that is what they plan on working with going forward because over time, both Orders <br /> require beach profiles to be done. Mr. Fogel states that-they will work with the went to find the best <br /> timing for beach nourishment and maybe even consider nourishment in the fall for storm prevention and <br /> one in the spring to raise the profile for the spring and summer. <br /> i <br /> Chairman Fitzsimmons asks about the beach nourishment that i t be-provided by Tidewatch and his <br /> understanding was that in the Order of Conditions that was issued previously instructed that the beach <br /> nourishment was to be-deposited in front of the Tidewatch property and not on the adjacent property. <br /> Agent McManus states that the original plan was tb deposit the sand over the lower half of the wall t <br /> strengthen the wall. The Chairman wants to know that if placing sand on the adjacent property will <br /> satisfy the Order of Conditions that was originally-given to Tidewatch. Agent McManus says that the <br /> rain issue is for Tidewatch to monitor their gall and if there is any undermining of the wall than the <br /> nourishment should occur on the wall as well. Mr. Fogel states that-the Order of Conditions read "The <br /> nourishment shall-be placed on the beach annually' and about 10% of the Tidewatch wall is on <br /> Bayswater property; the part with the steps at the end which is the corner that ratters most because <br /> that's where the water washes In and collects and scours. Mr. Fogel suggests that there is plenty of <br /> language in their Orders and in Bayswater's Orders that working with the agent would allow the best job <br /> possible to protect the bank and maintain the beach.. Mr. Fogel says that what works is the goal and if <br /> they find.a location that works then he suggests it is consistent with the language in the Orders. <br /> Chairman Fitzsimmons asks ghat i -the amount of beach nourishment that is owed by Tidewatch and <br /> Agent McManus states that the amount calculated from the year 2000 is 20,800 cubic yards which i <br /> from two different Order of Conditions; -1552 & 43-1166. There was a letter submitted by The <br /> Phoenix Group, Michael Gr t ke, which gives. the following information: 1n 1998, 1000 cubic yards.was <br /> placed by Tidewatch; in 1999, 200 cubic yards was placed at the end of the revetment; and in 2000, <br /> 500 cubic yards at the western end of the revetment. The agent has no other documentation showing <br /> any nourishment since then. Mr. Fogel states that they are still finding records of sand delivered, for <br /> example, in February of 2004 he has a proposal from a.o rpany called Ea y Doze It Excavating t <br /> Woods Hole Group for the reconstruction of the Tidewatch wall which includes placement of 4,0560 <br /> cubic yards of clean sand for beach nourishment and construction access. 'Mr. Fogel states than they <br /> are also interviewing prig Chairpersons of the Board of Trustees to see ghat they recall and if there <br /> are any undocumented nourishment episodes. Howie Galls states that he was the Board Chair in 2008 <br /> and he was told by the engineers after they built the seawall that the sand that was being placed at the <br /> second hole of the golf course was flowing and nourishing Tidewatch's seawall. <br /> Agent McManus states that'once the work is complete then an amended Certificate of Compliance can <br /> be submitted but he will confirm with Town Counsel. Mr. Colasuonno states that-tonight it has been <br /> agreed on that Tidewatch was going to nourish'1500 cubic yards on Bayswater's beach but he would <br /> like to know if there will be something in writing that states this will be done annually until they catch up <br /> on their deficit. Agent McManus states that they still need to address that and the Chairman says it will <br /> most likely be an enforcement order. Mr. -Fogel states that that is a separate issue and he will <br /> communicate with the agent while they are still locating records of beach nourishment but these two <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.