Laserfiche WebLink
Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Continuance until 4/16/09 at 7:00. <br /> 7:03 pm Carol and Robert Graham, Trustees, NOI—5 Ocean Bluff Drive (Renovate and upgrade <br /> the existing dock, remove and replace existing platform and re-vegetate the disturbed area) <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Continuance at the request of the applicant <br /> until 3/19/09 at 7:00. <br /> 7:06 pm Kenneth Marsters, NOI—77 Bayshore Drive (Vista pruning and vegetation control) <br /> John Slavinsky of Cape and Islands Engineering addressed the Commission on behalf of the applicant. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky noted that the applicant's measurements for vista pruning end before the marsh where the <br /> property line is located. The plan identifies 34 feet at the bottom of the bank and 27 feet up at the house. <br /> Agent McManus, upon inspection, discovered that some clearing had taken place on the bank. Mr. <br /> Slavinsky clarified that the vegetation control is the same as vista pruning. Since the vista pruning took <br /> place without a permit, Agent McManus does not feel it is appropriate to allow maintenance in perpetuity. <br /> Additionally, there is no longer a great need for additional vista pruning other than maintaining the shrubs <br /> at 6 feet, the height required in the bylaw. Agent McManus also suggests confirming the 34 foot linear <br /> measurement to ensure that additional clearing has not taken place and supports a close and issue without <br /> maintenance in perpetuity. The Chair read a letter from an abutter at 416 Thomason Road expressing <br /> concern about pond water conditions and the threat of eliminating protective vegetation in perpetuity. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to Close and Issue with no maintenance in <br /> perpetuity and the Conservation Department will confirm that the view corridor is limited to 34 <br /> feet otherwise mitigation will be requested. <br /> 7:09 pm Cornelius and Maureen Ferris, RDA—38 Seconsett Point Road (Replace bracing and <br /> decking on existing dock, remove and replace existing platform and re-vegetate the disturbed areas) <br /> Jack Landers Cauley is representing the applicant for this project. It was discovered that there were a <br /> number of irregularities during the process of the removal and rebuilding of the home. The applicants <br /> wish to remove the platform from the left of the dock on the salt marsh to be relocated to an upland lawn <br /> area, repopulating the marsh with plants. Additionally, the dock requires routine maintenance such as <br /> diagonal bracing and 1/3 of the deck. No pilings will be replaced. The owner also wishes to rebuild the <br /> deck within the three years permitted by the RDA. Assistant Agent Leidhold compared the original <br /> mitigation plans to the new plans and determined that plantings have decreased by 17, due to the <br /> relocation of the platform and the necessity to compensate for the platform. Mr. Landers Cauley believed <br /> that the original plan identified additional plantings. Ms. Costa pointed out that now the platform would <br /> be moved to a location originally slated for mitigation. Mr. Landers Cauley indicated that if the <br /> Commission wishes to add the additional plantings, the applicants will be willing, and he can meet <br /> directly with the staff to determine the location of the plantings and update and re-submit a plan for the <br /> record. The Commission discussed whether concrete existed under the platform as well as the new ramp. <br /> Mr. Landers Cauley stated the platform was built after 1978 and any concrete blocks would be removed. <br /> Concern was expressed regarding the unlicensed ramp sitting on the ground. Mr. Landers Cauley does <br /> not know the history on the ramp but did check on Chapter 91 regarding the ramp, and confirmed that it is <br /> a local issue. The Chair stated that all ramps require Commission approval. Assistant Agent Leidhold <br /> recommended that the dock repairs be included on the RDA but the additional work (ramp, mitigation <br /> plantings) be included in an amended order requiring conditions. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination on the RDA for the <br /> dock repair and refile an amended order for the ramp and relocation of the platform. <br /> 4 <br />