My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/3/2009 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
3/3/2009 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:17:41 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 1:34:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/03/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
recusal to which it was stated that it is not required to state the reason for recusal. The Chair asked about <br /> a project that, while being discussed,, a Commissioner realizes a recusal must be requested to which it was <br /> determined that the Commissioner-should request the recusal as soon as possible and be based solely on <br /> conflict of interest. Members questioned examples of when the project is a conflict of interest such as ars <br /> owner in condominium or an abutter(within 100 feet)to a project. Agent McManus has a handout <br /> regarding specific reasons for Conflict of Interest which he will distribute to the Commission. Mr. Pinaud <br /> recommends that the Commission put their documents in a binder for quick reference during heir <br /> meetings. Agent McManus reminded the Commission that a Commissioner sioner can abstain from voting but <br /> that they should be aware that the quorum could be affected. The Rule of Necessity can only be invoked <br /> if a Commissioner is recusing oneself under Conflict of Interest. Tl'e Agent further stated that if <br /> Commissioner is uncomfortable with the project and considering an abstention, be reminded that a no <br /> vote is also allowed. If there is a concern related to the project that does not fall under Conflict of <br /> Interest the information should be shared with theCommission- The Commission discussed making <br /> motion for a Continuance to which it was reminded that there must be a valid reason', on the record, for <br /> the Continuance. <br /> Conflict of Interest <br /> Commissioners should ensure that they do not meet the criteria for Conflict of Interest when they are <br /> considering a project. Commissioners are considered municipal employees as stated in the definition. <br /> Additionally, Commissioners are reminded not to discuss details outside of the public forum with one <br /> another. It was clarified that ema.ils and discussions directly with the Agent are acceptable. <br /> Commissioners may not spew directly with applicants except during the public meeting. <br /> Ms. Costa questioned how the Commission can ensure that each member has the same information to <br /> consider a project, to which Agent McManu recommended that each Commissioner take the initiative to <br /> fully inform themselves about the issues. The Chair agreed that before the Commission votes on any <br /> project, Commissioners must be fully informed. Assistant Agent Lei hold asked if it would be helpful to <br /> have a copy of the filing in advance of the meeting to be better informed about the project. Mr. Pinaud <br /> noted that, in the past, larger and more contentions project filings had been forwarded to Commissioners <br /> for earlier review, along with a reminder o the appropriate By-laws. For the more routine l roj e t , it <br /> may be unnecessary to have the added paperwork. Assistant Agent Leidhold thought it might expedite <br /> the meeting process if the information was available in advance. The Conservation Department could <br /> notify the Commissioners when the information is available for the larger projects. The Assistant Agent <br /> reminded the Commission of the necessity to be consistent so that no one feels disregarded. <br /> Rule of Necessity 0 <br /> _ <br /> Rule of Necessity is a vete that can only be used in the case of Conflict of Interest. The applicant would <br /> have a right to request a Continuance. Rule ofl Necessity occurs when the meeting starts as a quorum but <br /> a Commissioner asks for a recusal and thea must be asked to vote. The Chair asked for clarification <br /> because he understood it as a vote being allowed to occur without a quorum due to the recusal. Ms. Costa <br /> agreed that she understood Ryle of Necessity to mean that the vote could tape place without the quorum <br /> according to information from Town Counsel. Agent McManus re-read the Rule of Necessity which <br /> permits the participation of the disqualified member. <br /> Executive Session <br /> Agent McManus will distribute the 9 specific purposes for calling ars Executive Session which typically <br /> involves legal matters, personnel issues, land acquisition or personal issues. Typically a reason is <br /> Provided when the Commission must go into Executive Session. <br /> Clarity and Consistent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.