My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/30/2011 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
6/30/2011 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:26:05 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 3:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/30/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
is answered that there will be buoys/markers. Mr. Sander is concerned about safety because most <br /> Y of the boats at night speed through the canals. <br /> Tem Jalowy, Jalowy Landscape, is concerned with safety and the height of the cages. He asks <br /> what would happen if a kayaker hits and tumbles and becomes injured because of the cages. Mr. <br /> Jalowy is curious as to who will be liable. Agent McManus asks Mr. York if liability was discussed <br /> during the waterways commission review of the project and Mr. York responds that he does not <br /> believe so but he will have to check his minutes. Mr. Gurnee states that he is aware of at least one <br /> dock that extends as far as the aquaculture farm. Mr. York asks Mr. cook if he will have liability <br /> insurance and Mr. cook confirms that he will. <br /> Robert Zammito, 36 Popponesset Island Road, has great concerns over the anchoring system. He <br /> states that every winter there i s ars ice-flow which flows with the tide. The ice-flows which can b <br /> about a mile long move and it had actually snapped two of his poles one year. He feels that nothing <br /> will hold those cages down in the ice-flew and it will be very hazardous. Mr. Zammito also states <br /> money that he pays for a mooring and Agent McManus inf orms hire that financial issues are not the <br /> commission's concern. IIIb. Zammito also would like to forward an email to the Commission <br /> regarding heavy equipment that will be used to move the cages and feels that Mr. cook's <br /> description of the electric tool is not true. Mr. Cook rebuts Mr. Zammitoi comments and explains <br /> that in the winter, all of the cages will be moved into deeper waters below any possible ice damage. <br /> Mr. Gurnee asks where the cages will be moved to and Mr. cook says they will be moved to the <br /> outer deeper portion of the site. <br /> Alfred White, 2 Cross Tree Way, would like to discuss the function of the Conservation commission <br /> and the legal parameters that guide the decision authority. He continues by saying that the only <br /> beneficiary of the project is IIIb. Cook. He doesn't think that anyone would ever buy a home within <br /> 30° of a farm. He feels than it will reduce property values. He states that this is a business and the <br /> Commission would be approving a factory. <br /> Leslie Caffyn, 10 Po ppon es set Island Road cl a i rns that the pictures of the pro posed site are <br /> deceiving in where they are made to look like there are no surrounding houses. She states that <br /> people,kayak near the shore because it is calmer. She doesn't believe that they will be able to <br /> kayak over the cages and the will be required to go around therm. Also, if the cages push out and <br /> end up in the charnel, it would become hazardous. <br /> Attorney Brian wall, wh o is representing 21 residents, states that he has a couple of rotes from <br /> information that he has heard this evening. Pint, Mashpee's recreational interests do protect <br /> leisure activity or aesthetic enjoyment of wetland resources. Mr. wall states that Mashpee's bylaws <br /> do in fact protect the views and assuming that Mr. cook's calculations are correct regarding the <br /> submerged cages, the waters are clear in this area and the cages will be visible below the surface. <br /> Mr. wall add resses the opinion f rorn Town Counsel and he maintains that ashpee's bylaw is far <br /> more stringent then the state act and it clearly says in Regulation 3 an application will be ruled <br /> incomplete until all other applicable local and obtainable permits have been issued. Mr. Cook's <br /> application should still be ruled incomplete and withdrawn or continued until after the appeal is <br /> resolved. Mr. wall continued with his second point: Mr. cook has come back with more information <br /> but he feels that it has raised as many more questions. There has been no information submitted to <br /> the Board in regards to wave force and whether or not the anchors will stay in the ground. He <br /> believes, according to his calculations, that there will be Zoo rows of cages held down by 100 <br /> cables held down by Zoo anchors held together by 3000 connectors and sitting on pipes that will be <br /> driven into the ground. There has been no information submitted regarding hover Mr. Cool{plans on <br /> putting the pipes into the ground. Mr. Wall feels th t the Commission should require Mr. cook to <br /> submit ars Opp ration/Maintenance Manual; some kind of protocol or methodology as to what he will <br /> o on a day-today basis. Mr. wall also states that the Massachusetts Supreme court has made it <br /> very clear that aquaculture is not part of a public trust right and Mr. cook has no right to conduct <br /> any aquaculture above the mean low water mark so any intrusions above that for aquaculture <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.