6/30/2011 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

7:12 Todd & Dena Pav ne SE 43-2664 166 Waterway) Demo/Rebuild SFH with driveways, pool Not Contd from 6 611 Resource Area. Ccsl'al Bank; LSCSF. Buffer to Salt Marsh; Land Under Ocean Material submitted* Plot Plan ReconstructHouse Pgs 1-4 6128111 BSS Design r`Buffer Ship Restoration 6,711 Vaccaro Environmental Consulting Jack Vaccaro from Vaccaro Environmental is representing the applicant and explains that this property was previously approved for a demo/rebuild in 2008 with orders that are still valid but the new owners prefer a different footprint. The new structure will be built further back from the creek but would like to create a pool on the creek side so there is a net increase in structural footprint towards the creek. It will be required for the applicant.to provide sufficient mitigation to offset the increase in hardscape within 1 0r of the resource area. Mr. Vaccaro would like to remove the lawn area in front of the creek and restore it back to its natural state with native shrubs. The mitigation requirement would just be under 2000 sq. ft. of plantings and the applicant is supplying just over 2000 sq. ft. Mr. Vaccaro mentions that this project has been reviewed and approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Agent McManus inquires about the remnants of an old bulkhead wall associated with the property that currently extends out into Poppone sett Creek and Mr. Vaccaro expects that the gall will be addressed in the future. Villa. Sweet asks about the changes to the drainage on the proposed project and Mr. Vaccaro states that the engineer has designed a series of infiltration basins. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to close and Issue 7:15 Kenneth Par lski (357 I onomo co Road) Upgrade septic system to Title V RDA - esc Area. LSCSF MaterlW submitted* Plot Flea Existing t4ouse 6/16111, BSS s Tom Bunker from BSS Design requests approval for an upgrade to an a xisting septic system, He explains that there are two cottages that are each served by a separate cesspool. Both systems flow down to one septic tank and pump chamber and then pumped up to the highest point of the property. The n ew system wiI I be mo than o'f roan the wetl and s. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination 7;18 John Beasley Little Neck Lane) Rebuild dock in same foot Print- FDA Resource Area.- Land Under Ocean Ma te ria I submitted: Existing Dock& Wa A wa y 1012 }°9 1 F/Sal t Ma rs1 Staking Plan I OV'5`99 f`GIS Photos -owner Mr. Beasley explains that they are soon purchasing the property and would like to repair the dock that is in total disrepair. They would like to rebuild the dock and ramp in the same footprint which will include replacing the pilings. Mr. Gurnee comments thatthe drawing is different and Agent McManus states that they are going further out to reach a great water depth because when-the dock was originally built, the water was deeper in that area. Mr. Beasley.states that he is in the process of filing a Chapter 91 license for a new dock to bring it up to standard. Agent McManus informs Mr. Beasley of the required standards for plank spacing on walkways for the allowance of sunlight penetration to vegetation below the dock, Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination 7:21 .Jeffrey Cohen (1154 Fells Pond Fuad) Upgrade septic system -RDA Resource Area* Inland Bank,Buffer Zone to Pond Front Material submitted* Proposed Septic System .}1 7,11 Engineering Work, 6