Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Fitzsimmons mentions Senior Projects as well. one of the members of the MEC <br /> suggested a door-to-door campaign specifically in the areas of the entry ways to parcels.. Agent <br /> McManus states that things are progressing nicely and Kelsey is doing a great job. They have <br /> also been discussing the possibility of paying for a web site outside the town's web site. There <br /> could be more options as the town's website is very"standardized" and has limitations. Mr. <br /> Sweet suggests contacting' the Peninsular Counsel as they used to be very proactive in walking <br /> several parcels <br /> 4 Catherine Laurent (DPW Director)— Ms. Laurent explains that. she had presented a plan for storm <br /> water improvements at the end of Ma hpee Neck Road to the Commission with Baxter Nye a fear <br /> months ago. The project had received funding through the Cape Cod Water Resource <br /> Restoration toration Project. The grant amount from NRCS is about $140,000 which the town i <br /> responsible for a 25% match but specifically excludes from the grant any permitting costs and <br /> unfortunately DPW was not aware of these exclusions. The costs incurred were $4100 and Ms. <br /> Laurent is asking for reimbursement from Con om. Agent McManus informs the Commission that <br /> there are a couple of Conservation funds that are not part of the town's general fund. one is an <br /> Acquisition of Lands and Maintenance fund and the other is a general conservation fund. Both <br /> accounts have historically been used for the purchase of conservation land along with <br /> maintenance issues on those lands. The Agent explains that he has consulted torn counsel on <br /> the usage of these funds and reads the response for the record in which it states that if funds are <br /> being properly expended to maintain parcels which we protect than this type of expense is <br /> allowed. ' <br /> Motion.rade, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the expense of$4105 for <br /> environmental permitting for Ispee fleck Board Project <br /> 5) Jim Kal eit: 'log Noisy Hole Rd (utility work)— Mr. I al Breit explains that,the property noir <br /> consists of three lots which have been combined into one lot. The perk test was completed and <br /> although the separation was present, the D Lager would not allow a `f strip out" of the B Lager to <br /> create the separation. The rear lot is basically all sand,as they had dug down approximately 14'and it had kept collapsing on itself so they are looking to-place the septic in that area. There is an <br /> old cranberry bog in the back here thea was an old hand dug trench was created. Because of <br /> this, they need to file for a permit for a pump up system with a forced main. The forced main will <br /> be outside of the actual wetland but close to it; approximately 5'. Mr. kaleit is explains that prior <br /> to'agreeing to a purchase & sales agreement on this property, he is asking the Commission ghat <br /> the likelihood is to allow a hand dug forced main on the rear portion of the lot. Agent McManus <br /> informs the Commission that Mr. Kal Breit is asking what type of permit for this project. H <br /> explains that normally he would ask for an ICDA but where the forced main is so close to the <br /> resource area he had advised Mr. Kalveit to briefly present it to the Board. The Commission <br /> informs Mr. Kalweit that he would have to formally present the project-under an'RDA and at that <br /> time it would be decided if it will remain under that type permitting or if he will need to move <br /> forward with a of. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to ardiourr' the meeting at 8:25 pry. <br /> espe ullasitted, <br /> Cris Carpenter <br /> Administrative Secretary <br /> *`*All material submitted for hearings can be and on Conservation Flash Druce dated 711110 ` <br /> 5 <br />