Laserfiche WebLink
5/21./84 80 <br /> Mr, avren e: " had no qualms in that, Charlie, and I felt there was no conflict of <br /> interest* <br /> Mr. Bu .ngh . 5.. "No, and don'tthink that there was,," <br /> Mr. Lawrence: "There was nothing done, only a hole dug,, I think if anyone has to go <br /> back into the records they can see what my point of view vas." a went on to say <br /> that he really didn't cx what t-heir o ixiio1-ire over theme, ;Rilywray)) <br /> Mr. Lawrence in defense said it would be a different story if he said nothing before <br /> this, but he had sept the Board appraised of the situation., he had informed the Board <br /> continually. <br /> Wo ATMER COPY ON THI S SJ ' , IT BEGINS BECOME RHETOIRICAL AND AN ETHNIC <br /> REKARK USEDWHICH' GOES AGAINST ICY GAN <br /> F <br /> Mr. Buckingham finally stated that he was very curious., he has a definite idea that <br /> of what the recommendations from the county axe and he has a couple of things himself <br /> that he would like,, estimate from the datum they can acctmiulate at just what level a <br /> ten year storm or a five year storm will because he thinks that is important to the <br /> amount of cover that is over the pease tra ,. he septic tank and to the well being o <br /> a leaching field in that area. <br /> Mr. Lavrence stated he didn't care if it vere a fifty year storm, if wate l- inundates <br /> that area it:s going to seep into the ground it vill seep Into the diffusor pits and <br /> it's going to spread, it's going to pollute the pond it will spread)* <br /> r o Buckingham stated that in his reading of Title V., the , lan s as submitted were <br /> Incomplete., they have a residence that is to be in that Beach House, Title v states <br /> that if there is to be a residence and there is a pump in use that there shad <br /> be a cletely independent auxilary for that moose and there sha ,lbe a guaran-P <br /> tee that in the event of any flooding the residenclie vill not be used, now I don't <br /> know how in the hell they can acc 1i ski that but thi s i s- Title v requirement, under <br /> Section 10:3 or lo: , there were a lot of holes when you read Title V and look at <br /> what was being presented to us. Those are the reasons we can use for denial, when <br /> it comes to Conservation., what she is proposing to do is not mitering the dunes. <br /> It's going to take an EPA, it's going to take an environmental statement and probably <br /> and probably a MEPA statement before it can even begin to be considered from a conserm <br /> vation angle. There's no way they can rove that dune. Insofar as conservation and <br /> Coastal is concerned they can't begin to put the pipes in the area that they describe <br /> as the leaching field,, or diffusor or whatever, because it would mean they would have <br /> to disturb the topsoil. <br /> Mr. Lance: "What I s vhy I wouldn't let them put equipment out there because it autow <br /> matica ly disturbs." <br /> Mr. Buckingham. 11hat'.a right,, not vithout per scion." <br /> Mir s. Anderson: "Why can't they go up in that <br /> Mr.. a rence: e don't know and nobody wants to tell us." <br /> Mr. Buckingham: "You remember when they were ming their presentation, one of the <br /> things they c ,ted.was 'for not putting that area in that upland', where Mr. Lawrence <br /> recamended it should go and all of thought it should go, was that they felt that they <br /> culd,n't achieve a slope distance relative to either Deans Pond or the Sound., you <br /> know the answer to that is where at Mauahop the systems were put deeply enough so that <br /> they could achieve the slope <br />