Laserfiche WebLink
x <br /> GRC-- We've increased the l each i ng requirements above title V, We've tried to increase your s i Z i ng as a safety <br /> factor, We don't want-to cost your yore money. - It r <br /> CFB- EAM and I haves been, talking: the s 3000'gals per seat in the church probably will rpt be used, o we have <br /> 69-cushion there. Therefr +the loo gals tank although 9960 is required, is adequate considering the cushion <br /> actor. <br /> f, 1 -can urnde st nd where EAM & CFB are coring fran for safety treasons. If you're comfortable /the system <br /> as planned, I'll go along w/it.- If you ever did care to those flow nbers, you might be soory you didn't <br /> build in the excess capacity you-were asked to.' <br /> JE- For them to realize twice the usage that St,Fncis Xavier uses i unreal* <br /> CFB- the other issue i that wee requ�i re the.secohdary'to b ,installed w/the Primary' in ccrrmerc i a l estab l i h T en t <br /> and we have to .cons i der the church a cammerc i a l establishTent-This you have also requested variance from. <br /> Our reason is that engineering wise, it's sound. It gives the beds a chance to selfcleanse on aternating years, <br /> We'd be looking for a small en 1 argot if we grat this variance. I'd be w i l 1 i n to enter a i n a vari ance if <br /> you wou 1 d increase the amount os Mone around the leaching area, since this is where a failure would occur if <br /> anyuwher . Go fray 1 to 1 112-2 feet* <br /> JZ- I was thinking of punting in a d i venter valve to a l tern ate the proposed primary fields since at the <br /> anticipated flow rate, the trenches won't be fully activated anyway* Even hough this would be only half of <br /> what Title v requires, it makes more sense. <br /> CFB-- Makes sense to me. Instead of loading only the entry sections of all trenches. <br /> JZ- It has a biter chance of properly spreading out. <br /> G C- I think that's the best idea. <br /> CFB- Fine. Your parking lot drains are of the MDC type oil separation Theme will be a public we I 1 close <br /> to this area and possibly comunity wells. This my be in their recharge area.. <br /> JZ- A nuter of those bashes were leaching type, direct l into the ground. <br /> �-� We have aproblem with that type. We've wanted the Dtype. I'd ask ,you to change all to QC's. <br /> CFB- 1e would much prefer that type of drain, -because of the proximity to the proposed well situ. <br /> JZ- CSC, I think we can work that out. <br /> CFB- I would entertain a motion from the Board that we grant the necessary variances <br /> PCFWB- <br /> om- Motion made. <br /> - second <br /> All approved, so carried. We'll send ,your a letter to that effect outlining the Vdc request. <br /> Meeting with Housing Assistance Corp. re: Inspection Program <br /> ftrbers Attending: Nancy Om ett area rep. <br /> Bob Shae (area Insp <br /> CFB- I'll ask FAM to do the talking since he's had the most contact with this. <br /> EA M- As ,your know, I've sent copies of my correspondence to Cathy F i inn, in October,, I wrote to ,you in March <br /> trying to resov1e the problems ourr inspection procedures. It came to a head when we had a minor oil spill <br /> in Town on Great Neck road. Upon inspecting th oil spill I remarbered that I had inspected the dwelling for <br /> housing. I checked my files to see what the report stated and when J wer7t to investigate the spill, I noticed <br /> that none of the repair work which was l i ted as necessary prior to occupancy by housing was undertaken. I <br /> wrote to yopu then and even since thea Laura has come up /cases where people are already living in a house <br /> that she has just received an inspection request, or her recd ended repairs have not been completed prior <br /> to occupancy. This is why I and the Board asked you to cam in to explain your process and where in your <br /> opinion our inspection fits in. It makes no sense for us to inspect if the people are either living <br /> th r a l ready-or are a 1 l owed to move in before the reces sary repay i rs are carp 1 eted. <br /> NE--I didn't realize .you were doing re-inspections. <br /> F.- No, let rne explain: Say 6 months ago when we got an inspection request from ,you, there are three cate- <br /> gor i es of answers to check off: 1- Bldg meets min. req;-2. Bldg meets min. req, but sone work necessary and <br /> 3. Bldg does not meet min. standards. What we had been doing in many cases is checking off : meets rein, req* <br /> bunt same work necessary and thea we'd list what needed to be done. Since then and since what I found at Cr. <br /> k Road where the rye am-ended repairs were not done, I've told Laura to no longer use that category. So <br /> he'd not sign off and i ruste d go back to see if fine r� pa i r� were done and i n stead f i rid the people l i v i rig thea <br /> NE- As far as the people living them, somet i rhes the owner gets together the prospective tenant and they <br /> rake an arrangements and set up a-time to rove in-We do not enter into a lease until we inspect and pass the <br /> dwelling and until we receive notice from ,you that it is habitable. so we're not rlly responsible if some- <br /> one is living there before that.. <br />