Laserfiche WebLink
TOWN OF MASHPEE <br /> I - <br /> BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> June 21 , 1990 <br /> Meeting called to order at 7;00 p.m. <br /> Members present: Stephen J. Greelish and George R. Costa. <br /> Mr. Doherty joined the meeting at 8:45 p.m.. . <br /> THE TAPE IS HOT PARI' of THE MEETING IT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF <br /> TRANSCRIBING G MINUTES <br /> . Stephen J, Greelish, Chairman <br /> 1 . Warrants signed <br /> 2 , ) Mr. Costa motioned to accept the minutes of June 14 , <br /> 1990 , Mr. Greelish seconded. <br /> Mr. Costa motioned to accept the Executive Session min- <br /> utes of Jure 12, 199 , Mr, - Greelish seconded. <br /> At this time as Ms. Mills was in attendance Board members <br /> moved to #17 on the agenda. <br /> 17, ) Report by K, ..- V. Associates re: Mashpee River...Modeling <br /> Stud - Ms. Mills stated to the Hoard she would like to dis <br /> cuss an issue, as a► private citizen, regarding the use of a <br /> vacant building at the "Riverbend" . Ms, Mills stated, ,in her <br /> opinion, Mr. Halpern does not have the legal right to utilize <br /> the entire building for occupancy. At the present time there <br /> are people living within the building. . <br /> Mr. Greelish questioned whether the building has anoc- <br /> cupancy permit. <br /> Nis. Mills responded the building was abandoned for at <br /> least two years, if there was an occupancy it has since <br /> lapsed. Under the non-conforming law a structure once aban- <br /> doned for two years or more must conform to present zoning <br /> requirements. The structure was previously used, about <br /> twenty years ago, to house motel employees during the summer <br /> months. Since that time the structure has been used for <br /> storage. Through the years the plumbing was removed and used <br /> in other areas of the complex. <br /> Mr. Costa referenced Ms. Mills Letter of 1988 regarding <br /> the illegal use of the building. At that time this Board <br /> questioned the Building Inspector as to whether the structure <br /> was considered a pre-existing non-conforming use. The Board <br /> never received a response from the Building Inspector. <br />