Laserfiche WebLink
{ MINUTES .- BOARD of HEALTH MEETING JULIA 131, 1989 <br /> page 2- <br /> bility of the water at this site. The second issue is that of the right-of way. <br /> Weston & Sampson objected to the Board granting an easement acroos the landfill <br /> , property for the purpose of building an access road to the development. W & S' s <br /> comments further stated that if the Board were to grunt the easement at least <br /> a fifty or 100 foor�t buffshould b required alongtheroadway, <br /> Mr. 14 i rrane stated that in compliance with the Planning Board a 100 foot <br /> buffer on each side of the road would be a part of the special permit* <br /> . Fudala, Mr. Iirrane and the Board studied the plans as to location of <br /> the road, the future treatment p 1 and and the. transfer Station. <br /> Mr. Ferrera indicated that in his oppinion land was being cleared beyond the <br /> townro ert in the area of the pit.fr. Virgilio countered that they were <br /> p p, <br /> clearing in compliance with Wes s surveying of the property. Mr, costa asked <br /> Ernie to look into this with WBS. <br /> Mr. costa stated another concern the Board has is with the row of lots <br /> directly abutting the landfill lagoon arxea.We were under the impression that <br /> as with the original condo pian there would be enough greenspace between the <br /> lagoons and the homes than we would not be getting complaints from abutters <br /> about sme 11 and l i tter the way we h ave been rxece 1 v i ng from -acros s the way on <br /> Asher' s Path. <br /> Mr. Kirr ne stated that the original condo plan didnot include the area <br /> directly behind the lagoons. This OSID plan however does include this property <br /> and access to it would be from Meetinghouse Road and Asher' s Path. The lots in <br /> question are fairly deep and we could restrict building within the 50 feet zone _ <br /> closest to the lag ons as long as we could place the septics fully in the rear. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding tying in the two open space corridors. <br /> Mr. costa questioned the possibility of trading the isolated + cr s <br /> created by the roadway for the row of lots directly abutting the lagoon area. <br /> ,f <br /> Mr, Greelish agreed that at least a restrictive covenat be attached to those <br /> lots adjacent to the lagoons prohibiting buildings closer than 50 feet from the <br /> property line. He stated that WBS has not yet affirmed the location of the pro-= <br /> posed treatment plant. <br /> Mr. McQuaid co mente.d that his biggest concern is what kind of water <br /> quality will be obtained in that area.In spite of the fact -that the grounwater <br /> flow direction is generally away from the proposed site, a. possible second <br /> contamination plume, i f indeed it exists would most likely f1own directly <br /> into this area. He further recommended to the Board that it hold off approving <br /> any new wells in the area and wait until public water is available <br /> Mr. 14irrane stated that the intent is to lay the water mains and hook into <br /> public water as soon as It becomes available.However we wish to drill weds and <br /> submit to water analyses and based on their results obtain building permits <br /> while waiting for public water. He responded to the notion of creating a moratorium <br /> area would only be justified if the water was first proven to be unpotable. <br /> He stated that under town by-law they would be required to sink a pair of monitoring <br /> well for each ten lots. <br /> Mr, Greelish stated that if the water com ision ' s estivate of time for <br /> public water availability in this area is anywhere near accurate, the issue <br /> of wells is probably route. <br />