Laserfiche WebLink
s + <br /> could tell him that their jurisdiction is to review the project in accordance with <br /> regional policy plan. The regional policy plan places limitations on developments <br /> in close proximity to public water supplies among other things, <br /> Mr. Doherty stated that obviously, if, the operative word being "if', we would <br /> probably all agree that it will, but if it were to impact the wells. Obviously, it has a <br /> regional impact and will impact the entire town. It doesn't need to be said Haat <br /> obviously we could not afford to lose those wells. A couple ofquestions come t <br /> mind. Do you think that New S abur r is willing to negotiate in the terms of <br /> perhaps treating the storm water run-off' Sure they are going to talo care ofall of ; <br /> the residential sewerage. Yes, there might be some leakage in the pipes. That is <br /> probably acceptable. The first thing he saver there was the storm water directly up <br /> gradient and thea the driving range. You know they are going to keep it green, As <br /> far as he knows the only way to keep it green is with nitrogen. Are they willing t <br /> address those terms? If they are not willing to address Hoose issues thea they <br /> have no choice but refer it to the Commission. <br /> Mr. Henchy replied by stating that he would like to talo each issue one at a time. <br /> What they have said in thein environmental impact report regarding the,driving <br /> range is that they are not going to fertilizer... <br /> Mr. Doherty interrupted him and said that that is not being realistic. <br /> Mr. Henchy continued by stating that he is telling him the truth and trying t <br /> answer Mr. h rty's question. This is what they have said. The truth is is that is <br /> not binding in any moray. That is what they have said in an environmental impact <br /> report. But, if they charge their mind there is nothing to say that can',t do what <br /> they errant. As to the treatment ofthe storm water run-off, they have really been <br /> very emphatic in their views about the storm water run-off. The treatment and <br /> retention has been one of the things that they have been suggesting. Their <br /> response has been this plan. He won't speak for theta and won't be unfair t <br /> them. But, their experience has been that they have been very reticent to do <br /> anything meaningful. The plain fact of the utter is that have determined that <br /> this is the level ofthe development Haat they want to complete here. They have <br /> made every effort to shoe horn it in and have not been responsive to the concerns <br /> of the Mashpee water district in any meaningful way. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that he had a quick-question a.nd maybe Mr. Harrington would <br /> know. What i s our responsibility of a well head? I s it 400}, 500' or 1000'?where is <br /> our jurisdiction? <br /> Mr. Doherty responded Haat the Id's jurisdiction is the entire town. <br /> Mr. Harrington agreed that the entire town is our jurisdiction. He was actually <br /> going to ask that question himself. The BOA I's jurisdiction right now i <br /> encompasses all Title V issues, which they have none because they are going to <br /> be attached to a treatment facility. The properties are within a Zone IL But, really <br /> there is very little other jurisdiction on a property specific basis, But, as the B 0 H <br /> we are responsible for providing clean and safe water to the citizens of Mashpee. <br />