My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/2/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
5/2/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:36:59 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:17:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/02/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
leach pit and then it can drop into the drainage swarle. It is very difficult <br /> to understand what Mr. Santos is saying at this point in time because of <br /> other noise.) <br /> Mr. Harrington had spoke to Mr. Fudala about the slope swales also. But, <br /> he didn't like the slope s ales next to the road due to contamination. His <br /> example was what if a car crashes and the gas rims down under the <br /> grass. Mr. Fudala wanted the best of both worlds, which left Mr. <br /> Harrington batting his head against the wall. <br /> Mr. Doherty started that the BOH was pretty clear on this. They were not <br /> in the business of marking any mosquito nurseries. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that Mr. Fudala understands that but-aurin wants <br /> to have the best of both worlds. <br /> Mr. Santos made a motion to continue this topic until the next meeting. <br /> Mr. Ball seconded the motion. Motion passed. <br /> OLD BUSINESS: <br /> A. smokin_s Regulations: (This portion of the minutes is verbatirr�.� <br /> Mr. Doherty, "Giving the recent past hearings that we have had and <br /> public comment and studies that involve second hand smoke. I think it i <br /> long overdue that we have taken more steps than we have originally <br /> taken, Although, 1 have wrestled with the idea of protecting individuals <br /> rights. I still agree that an individual's right to clean air su percdes an <br /> individual right to otherwise taint it. However, I still recognize certain <br /> circumstances where although I don't think it is wise I think it should be <br /> allowed. .1 would like to revise our regulations to reflect essentially <br /> smoking barns in any areas where the general public is allowed <br /> specifically in the areas where chiidren are allowed. I guess i need to <br /> make myself clear. 1 don't have the enact wording down yet. <br /> I have heard a lot of arguments for an adults right to choose to smoke. I <br /> agree with than. If you want to choose to smoke that is fine. 1 think the <br /> issue here is not whether you should barn smoking here there or <br /> anywhere, But, that public gathering places where all of the public <br /> including children should offer relatively free without contaminants. <br /> Nothing is going to be perfect. As 1 have said before if you want clean air. <br /> You are going to have shut down all of the power plants and stop all of <br /> the cars. I think it is reasonable to expect than we can go into the <br /> supermarkets, restaurants, theatres and publicly owned buildings and <br /> expect relatively free and clean arir, some people are going to disagree <br /> with me but 1 also recognize that there are certain gather places where <br /> adults and I am going to say adults only than like to go and smoke. If that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.