My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/5/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
9/5/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:56:10 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/05/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 5 M <br /> requested a meeting with the BOF too. The meeting on October 3', 2002, <br /> will address this issue and.the board's approach to handling the smoking <br /> regulation. <br /> Mr. Woolridge asked there were going to be any public meetings. <br /> Mr. Santos replied that there would be no public forum meetings. The <br /> issue has been discussed to death. The board has had more than enough <br /> input from all interested parties. <br /> Mr, Woolridge asked again if the restaurant grew was going to have a <br /> meeting. <br /> Mr. Ball replied that they weren't even given a chance. The vote has <br /> basically been turned, which is the bottom live in the natter. ' <br /> Mr, woolridge was given a copy of the letter from town counsel. <br /> B. Ille al Septic Installation <br /> Mr. Santos updated Mr. Ball with the fact that the last meeting included <br /> another situation of illegal installation of a septic in town. He wanted to <br /> throw the suggestion out on the table that they place the burden on the <br /> engineer to report to the Boli who the installer is on the job. They should <br /> be working together. Somebody needs to take the ball on these <br /> situations. The BOH doesn't have the time or the personnel to be able to <br /> police emery single septic installation going on in town, should they put <br /> the burden on the engineers and the owners? <br /> Mr. Ball wanted to know why they couldn't issue a fine. <br /> Mr. Harrington wasn't sure if Title V addressed this type of problem. Title <br /> V solely asks the engineers to certify that the system was installed with <br /> their design plan and Title V, He didn't feel that there was any burden of <br /> proof within Title V that the engineer has to check that the installer is <br /> licensed in the tonin. They would have to institute that by regulation <br /> should they want to do that. <br /> Ills. Warden suggested that they could send a list of the installers every <br /> year. <br /> Mr, Harrington stated that a lot of times the contractors aren't there <br /> when the engineer goes to do their final inspection to twice their shots <br /> and measurements as far as the location. The contractor is not there so <br /> they don't actually know who put the system in. They are called after the <br /> system is in to certify it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.