My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/23/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
1/23/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:03:49 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:50:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/23/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
causing manifest injustice because they were still allowing the ability to <br /> use the property. They could deny this variance and net cause manifest <br /> injustice because there Is an approved plan in place for the size and the <br /> exact existing footprint for the original cottage. Depending on what they <br /> wanted to held Mr. Grotzke too. They could hold therm to that. They could <br /> set just about any condition that they wanted upon there because they <br /> were requesting variances, Or they could deny it and make them stay to <br /> this plan, which was on record right now. <br /> Mr. Santos asked Mr, ball for his opinion. <br /> Mrs Ball responded that he was leaving it up to him. <br /> Mr. Santos asked everybody for his or her input and asked him hover he <br /> was going to vote on it. <br /> Ms, Grady asked wanted to be clear on the fact that the 1999 approval did <br /> not include this variance. <br /> i y <br /> Mr. Santos confirmed that that was correct. It only approved the system <br /> for the cottage that was there. <br /> Nis. Grady asked Mr. Grotzke to explain to her why the current system <br /> before them was better. <br /> Mr, Grotzke replied that it was the same as the 1999 plan as far as the <br /> flow goes. <br /> Mr. Harrington added it was the same as the 1999 plan with the exception <br />' of the foundation, <br /> Mr, Grotzke re-iterated that the adjacent cottages had been built and had <br /> been given similar approvals for all of the others. He didn"t feel that the <br /> board should be inconsistent with the last two lots when people had <br /> bought these properties and expected a similar sort of approval from the <br /> town as per the adjacent cottages. <br /> Mr, Ball asked how much bigger the foundation was going to be compared <br /> to the 1999 approval. <br /> Mr. Grotzke thea pointed to the engineered plans and stated that this was <br /> the existing foundation and the new foundation was over there. <br /> Mr, Ball asked if it was going to be double. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.