Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> Mr, Harrington responded that it was 251 by Title V and 501 by the town's <br /> regulations. Furthermore, the plan notes that the lot was serviced by town <br /> water. <br /> j IIs. Grady re-iterated that there was an existing irrigation well. <br /> Mr. Santos was concerned with a house that had a well in front. <br /> Mr, Harrington re-iterated that it was serviced by town water. <br /> Mr. Santos noted that the plan that he had was the old one that shows <br /> where the well was. Now they are hooked up to town water, He was just <br /> curious if this was an irrigation well that was still being used. <br /> Mr, Harrington responded that even if it was it had to be over 25 or 501, <br /> IVIS. Warden added that the applicant only needed one well. It was <br /> irrigation and it didn't matter. <br /> Mr, Darrington agreed with IVIS. Warden They didn't even know if he's <br /> verified that. He is still shoving... <br /> i <br /> Mr. Santos asked about lot 82, <br /> Mr. Harrington asked Ms. Garron if the engineer gave them a new corer <br /> letter, <br /> IVIS. Garron responded that the engineer only gave her the two plans. But, <br /> that was what Ms. Grady was asking for in the first place. she was asking <br /> for the letter that gees with the plan, Ms, Garron slid not receive a letter <br /> upon delivery. <br /> Mr. Santos continued that if these are all houses on these lots* He re- <br /> iterated that not all of these people could be hoofed up to town water <br /> even if the plan notes that water is available.. <br /> i IVIS. Grady meted that it didn't say anything about the ether lots. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Harrington added that the calculations don't match up either. <br /> Ms. Grady made a motion to continue this request until the necessary <br /> information is added to the plans for further clarification. Mr. Santos <br /> seconded the motion. Motion passed. <br /> . Emer_qency Certification: <br /> x <br /> 4 <br /> i - - <br />