Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> a <br /> F <br /> Mr. Ball stated that,, if Mr. Churchill wanted, the board could continue this <br /> and he could bring it back to the applicant to talk about It. That was up <br /> to him, <br /> Mr, Churchill stated that basically she has a failed system that was going <br /> to require a denitrification. The board's regulations state that they need <br /> to meet this regulation for the variance request. If the board feels as <br /> though they need an alternative treatment because they could not meet <br /> that regulationthen that was the board's wish, They were at the board's <br /> mercy. This was an elderly woman who was basically upgrading her <br /> system. They were not asking for anything but to come up to Title V <br /> compliance. Title V is a 501 setback. He Knew that there have been <br /> studies done that show the traveling that has been done in the sandy <br /> aquifers to wetlands. Obviously you are going to have the viruses and <br /> ether types of bacteria. But, Title V is the state environmental code. They <br /> did studies also to determine that setback. They meet the state <br /> regulation. They just don't meet the local regulations. There was going to <br /> be some type of pathogens and viruses that were going to occur Into this <br /> wretland. You are using alternative treatments Mill to reduce that, He felt <br /> that under the conditions, if it wasn't a repair he wouldn't have a problem <br /> 2 <br /> F <br /> with this request* <br /> Mr. Harrington first thought that the location was isolated. But when Mr. <br /> { Churchill had his wetland specialist determine..*what was the bony o <br /> water that he said it went out to <br /> Mr, Churchill responded that he didn't specify a body of water because he <br /> didn't see it on the USGS map* If it was lame enough he didn"t know what <br /> it was bordering on& <br /> Mr, Barrington was surprised to see it listed as a BVW and not isolated. <br /> { He stated that it sure looked isolated when he was up theres <br /> 4 <br /> i <br /> Mr. Ball stated that according to this it was a BVWM <br /> Mr. Harrington concurred with Mr. Ball. It didn't look big enough* But, It <br /> had to be tied to something. <br /> Y Mr. Sall added that since the original denitrification systems arrived six <br /> or seven years ago. The state regulation was 501 and the board always <br /> stated 100". Then with the denitrification systems they went down to 751 <br /> and then 75 to 501 with Lill light. They have been consistent with this <br />- . approach He d <br /> idnyt feel that the board should change their position on <br /> this matter tonight with a requested variance of 59.11 from the BVw. He <br /> x �. sv^e-+,wx-� •wa-*+�r•wt•�.v,• a''i.r�,aw,; +5sr+t•r:�,r•;.. . $• <br />•-.i *-.k....w-hr,+Frars:�#c -xr�w+,y.�.++.*`.pr r'r-:+C;'-1 +'.` .-.,.. :f-may.,� .. <br /> -y � T a-.tirµ atm-'•'„�"'. ft <br />� � 7lh hM1y"' }��'.'# { -}p*F, 7'rl=+ •ilT 4"i w t <br /> 4 '�, _ .a..-yrs"++�_. yfF•z':}¢r�r«IF+r,'-•:a..•fir[`.•.,k.r. y .'..•� ` � �.� <br />_.i'_'f -+" `",fi Yw"•,` '�+5r+-ir'p.:'53`JY`�4.F%=}. ;Y'�•y'+ ~'#b`y7*- �r {`., .?'- - <br />