Laserfiche WebLink
further investigationo <br /> 4, BCHED qroundwater test results for the Ma h ee Landfill (April Round <br /> Mr. Lull asked if this was another FYI or were there some concerns. <br /> Ms. Grady interjected that she was confused by the one well that had yet <br /> to be sampled, <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that that was the well that had a bailer stuck in it. <br /> He has been trying to get the well re-drilled. He was unable to accomplish <br /> that at present. <br /> Ms, Grady asked if that was the one that he was going to fix with some <br /> PVC pipe, <br /> Mr, Harrington responded that that was a different well that needed gent <br /> repair. That was not a groundwater monitoring well. This well in question <br /> is a groundwater monitoring well. There was nothing of concern. All levels <br /> were within acceptable pararneters. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if this was not going to give us a bad mark with the DEP <br /> because they couldn't test it,. <br /> Mr, Harrington verified that it would not be held against therm, <br /> Ms. Grady asked if this wasn't something that vire wouldn't have to get <br /> fixed at some point. <br /> Ills. Warden responded that they tried to get it fined before the end of the <br /> lest fiscal year. <br /> Mr. Harrington added that they couldn't appropriate any money without an <br /> invoiced <br /> IIIb. Bell asked if they had any money to fist it. <br /> Mr, Harrington responded that there wasn't any money at this point in <br /> time. <br /> IVIS. Grady asked how much it was going to cost to fisc the well. <br /> Ms. Warden responded that Mr. Scannell would have to find the other well, <br /> toe. Where was a well that was missing. <br /> Ms, Grady re-iterated that one was missing. <br /> 2 <br />