My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/24/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
7/24/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:46:28 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:58:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> Mr. Ball asked if that was in their original motion to do that. <br /> Mr. Grotzke replied that it was not. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that that would have to be added in to it. Mr. Ball asked if <br /> that was all on this particular topic. correct? <br /> Mr. Grotzke agreed that that was all the change in distance and the <br /> butane membrane. <br /> Mr. Harrington noted that it was going to be less than the 501 that they <br /> had previously approved for 3 Ocean Bluff. <br /> Mr. Ball added that Mr, Grotzke could deal with Mr. Harrington on that <br /> one. <br /> B. Brickyard Marketplace <br /> Mr, Grotzke provided the board with a quick chronological description of <br /> where they are with the Brickyard today. This is a problem issue that was <br /> net going away. It was unfortunate that the current health meat and <br /> beard were inheriting this because it was the previous administration that <br /> dealt with this and worked with therm, Originally they had submitted for <br /> the Brickyard Marketplace a septic system with denitrification for 1000, <br /> he thought, gallon flow. The application showed it to be a 2000 GPD that <br /> was approved. As part of that approval they had approved a variance to <br /> groundwater from five feet to four feet for the leaching area. Again that <br /> was something that now they know that was explicitly not authorized <br /> under the regulations. However, for recent construction the state typically <br /> allows a reduction in the separation to groundwater based upon <br /> denitrification. it was something almost every denitrification system <br /> allows you a reduction to groundwater, <br /> Mr,, Harrington interjected that that was allowable under remedial <br /> conditions. <br /> Mr. Grotzke agreed with that and added that it just showed a technically <br /> feasible thing to do, At any rate they had local approval for the system <br /> with the groundwater variance. They started the construction and at the <br /> same time he decided to submit this to the DEP even though he had had <br /> early indication that this was a local decision. That was from a discussion <br /> with Elias McQuaid, health agent, and cri tos Drnisioros, who is no longer <br /> with that division of the DEP. When they submitted this thing to the state <br /> the state came back right away and said four-feet to groundwater-forget <br /> it-they were not going to accept that technical deficiency. He carne back <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.