Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> i <br /> actually providing the flown That was something that Mr, Hajjar was not <br /> responsible form He did not own the restaurant. There may be a legal <br /> battle there where the restaurant where that portion of that building is <br /> own. He could shut that septic off. If that septic was in the land that he <br /> owned he has rights to that septic. But, his agreement when the <br /> restaurant changed hands they said that they were responsible for their <br /> septic system too. That tie right there would make them responsible for <br /> meeting the 600 GPD regulation by possibly putting in a dentrification# <br /> Mr, Ball asked hew long they wanted to waif for this to happen. <br /> i <br /> Mr, Santos stated that back in November when they gage the board their <br /> excuses why they didn't have everything through the DEP, He had asked <br /> and the board voted on it that they come in front of the board sometime in <br /> December for the extension because December 31"t, 2003, was the firm <br /> cut off date. 1t has still not cone in front of the beard with some type of <br /> date that this was going to be accomplished. They have always required <br /> some type of date that would let there know when this was going to b <br /> i <br /> done. They have never been back in front of the board. <br /> Mr, Harrington had met with Mr. Hajjarr and the DEP has sent letters <br /> requesting additional information. The DEP has made the board aware <br /> that they have hire over the barrel. This may be taken out of the board's <br /> hands and ultimately right now it was out of the board's hands, If they <br /> force him into the groundwater dlsch'arge program the whole property is <br /> going to be done. He let hire know that if he hadn't chosen a piloting <br /> program it would have been dome. If he had chosen a new technology. <br /> Mr. Santos re-iterated that that was the only reason why there was a hold <br /> -UP, <br /> Mr. Ball wanted to know if there was any action they could take against <br /> the restaurant. <br /> Mr. Harrington needed to notify them that their transfer kicked in their <br /> local regulation and our timelines can start from then. But, they needed to <br /> notify there first. <br /> B. Review of Bedroom Regulation <br /> This was continued because they were not prepared to discuss it at this <br /> point in time, Mr. Harrington wanted the board to do a technical review of <br /> this regulation prior to submitting to the paper for final approval. <br /> C. Board Meeting Dates <br /> Mr. Ball stated that they were going to meet next on February 121", 2004. <br /> 17 <br />