Laserfiche WebLink
1 M <br /> IL <br /> 4 <br /> els# Grady asked for an'update on the Plaza Del sol* <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that he had nothing new on that situation. <br /> D. I 10 Creat Heck Road south <br /> Ills. Carron stated that els. Warden wanted her to remind Ms. Grady that <br /> this address' septic system had been installed. <br /> Mr. Darrington added that.four out of the five abutters on that road <br /> connected to town water, That was a huge victory for that whole area <br /> because that area was a mess. The wells and the septic were 301 to 501 <br /> away from each other. That whole area was so old. There were high <br /> nitrates in that area. If was an excellent result. <br /> APPOINTMENT: Deer crossing - rbo's1Hai'ar Management <br /> Mr* Richard A. Dalton was present representing Mr.-I ichardi as the owner <br /> of carbo's Grille & Bar at Deer crossing. Mr,, Charles Hajjar of Haar <br /> Management and Mr. McGrath of Holmes and McGrath were also present,, <br /> Mr., Darrington began by stating that they had sent a letter to carbo' , as <br /> they were made aware of the fact that they purchased the restaurant unit. <br /> They were over 600 CPD. Therefore, he sent them a letter stating that <br /> they needed to comply-with the town's regulation 70. Them hes been <br /> conversation and correspondence regarding whether that regulation <br /> actually applies because they are a condominium unit versus the actual <br /> landowner. This letter was just presented by Mr. Dalton, Esq. What he has <br /> tried to do is break this information down to make it simple, Mr. Dalton <br /> has specified other references in Title V, which addresses condominiums. <br /> It also mentions that the master deed-specifies what can and cannot be <br /> done to the property. As far as the board needs to determine tonight, did <br /> their regulation actually apply? He believed that it did for this following <br /> fact. Within the board's regulation 70 it referenced the system and not <br /> the owner or the operator. It referenced that the systems that received <br /> over 600 DPD upon property transfer must rine upgraded to come into <br /> compliance with the regulation. It did net state who was actually <br /> responsible for doing it. It just states that the system. must be upgraded. <br /> Another section of Title V that he wanted to refer to was 310 CMR 15,300 <br /> number 4, This was "Title V that the board was the approving authority for <br /> and it says that "any person owning or operating a facility on which an <br /> unsafe subsurface'sewerage treatment and disposal system was installed <br /> shall be responsible for the inspection, maintenance of and any necessary <br /> upgrades to the system." He felt that there are conflicting documents now <br /> that state that civilly between the owner and the operator is the master <br /> deed, which requires that they determine between themselves, as civil <br /> patrons. But, as far as the board of health is concerned they have the <br /> 7 <br />