Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> i <br /> IL lr. Harrington replied that the stated did not allow those credits once <br /> they were over.2000 CPD. <br /> Mr. McGrath agreed and stated that that was essentially correct. <br /> Commercial denitrification systems were treated different. He wanted to <br /> add that on April I 1202g0 , they voted to go from 58 seats at Carbols to <br /> 100 seats outsidem so prier to April 10t", 2000, there were only 513 seats. <br /> The issue here was that the DEP had examined this thing with a fine <br /> toothcomb. He was puzzled by the DEP because they actually told,therm <br /> to order the parts around Thanksgiving. 'T'hank Cod he didn't order the <br /> parts because the reviewer died and they started anew, He was puzzled <br /> because if it was a huge problem. The difference between a ground water <br /> discharge permit and Title V is dramatic. A groundwater discharge permit <br /> required that someone had to take an observati,on of BCD, temperature, <br /> PH everyday, five days per week. The samples have to be graph instead <br /> of composite samples. The range of the constituents of the tests are- <br /> much broader. The fee for a groundwater discharge permit was $5800.0. <br /> In 1999 was currently $10,000.00. Was $1-0,000.00 worthy'of 50,000 GPD <br /> r 'i , g CPD? so when confronted with the description of the increase <br /> in costs would be ruinous. He is asking the board to help them find a xray <br /> to reduce this flow. <br /> Mr. Ball felt that this was ghat they were there for. They had'to help <br /> therm get under the 10,000 CPD somehow r some way. They would work <br /> with them to get this but they would have to get if done. <br /> Mr. Haj,Jar then produced a letter that showed it went from 58 to 100 <br /> seats to support what Mr. McGrath was saying. once again if they <br /> wanted to have +1000 seats and pay for a groundwater discharge, thea so <br /> be it. He didn't have a problem With that. He just couldn't afford to do it. <br /> Mr. Dalton asked the board what the date was on the letter. <br /> Mr. Santos replied that it was dated May gt", 2000. <br /> Mr. Dalton had a piece of material elated May '101', 2001, that noted an <br /> approval from the Boil the removal of seven seats from the interior <br /> leaving 61 seats and permitting 24 additional paper seats outside. <br /> Mr. Ball if he understood correctly there would not be anything outside. <br /> Mr. Hajar confirmed that that was correct, as it was all common area. <br /> They presented them with a -day notice. <br /> Mr. Ball thought that that was a -seat loss. <br />