My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/1/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
7/1/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:45:09 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:31:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/01/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 4 <br /> to uncover this stuff anyways, <br /> Mr. Graci countered by stating that the code did require them to open up <br /> the -box but not the leaching fields. <br /> Mr. Santos agreed. <br /> Mr. Graci continued that their additional regulation required that they <br /> open up the [each field. Have they really thought about their adversion to <br /> using a camera They would be digging one less hole. <br /> Mr. Santos felt that if they were going to do that they might as well <br /> inspect the whole system with a camera. <br /> Mr. Graci interrupted Mr. Santos and stated that Mr. Harrington was <br /> requiring them to dig up the field. The field would 9% of the time tell <br /> them what was going on. It could be very expensive for some of the <br /> homeowners, The code was enforced back in 1978 when it was started. <br /> Life would be a lot easier,, He had brand neva systems that he inspected <br /> this week that within two years will still be off within the sic inches and <br /> one foot of grade, so they were going to tell him that he would have to go <br /> back to that homeowner. Then they were going to say why wasn't this <br /> done and what was he supposed to tell the homeowner. <br /> IIA . Warden felt that them could be arrangements made between the <br /> existing and perspective homeowner. These things could be arranged at <br /> the time of transfer. <br /> Mr. Graci interjected that they were hoping to have a meeting where they <br /> would both be paid would be an ideal situation. <br /> Ms. Warden interjected that this mostly 99% for the transfer of the <br /> property. The way the situation currently was it was unlikely that the -, <br /> homeowner was going to lose money on the home. she tended to disagree <br /> with him and 99.9% of the people would be able to afford the repair. They <br /> were just trying to cover those systems that may get overlooked and not <br /> get failed when indeed they were in failure. That was what they were <br /> trying to do. The problem was that the cameras could turn and they were <br /> not 100% accurate. <br /> Mr. Graci added that another thing in the new regulation was that they <br /> wanted to know how all of the sewer pipes go from one tank to another. <br /> How were they supposed to determine that? <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that it was just by approximate layout to show <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.