Laserfiche WebLink
M <br /> S <br /> 40i <br /> board made to open up that reserve area to grant the additional flow for the <br /> restaurant. The fourth seat was there when Mr. Haj j ar purchased the property. Again, <br /> there were still discrepancies here putting there back over the 10,000 GPD threshold. <br /> Also, in Building C, which was not one of the buildings that they had before the <br /> board. But, it did come to play in the overall flows for the facility. Mr. I raj j ar had <br /> seat hire a letter with some of the flows on there. He felt that Building C needed t <br /> be broken down farther than just saying retail and office because there were two <br /> gyms in there also. The other thing too was,that he had written a letter for Mr. <br /> Haj j ar. Mr. Haj j ar had asked hire to write a letter at the time that Mr. Man li had <br /> closed Giovanni's. Mr. HaJar wanted him to state that any new facility in that. <br /> location whether it be restaurant or retail had to be evaluated under Title V. He did <br /> write that letter. Something also that could happen there was that if Giovanni's was <br /> not a restaurant and went back to retail. They would be picking up 1600 GPD. That <br /> would bring therm under 10,000 GPD and there would be no other flow problems at <br /> all. He felt that that was something that he needed to talk to Mr. HaJar about as far <br /> as handling the remainder of these flows. The hoard was between a rock and a hard <br /> place because of tieprevious decisions that were made. <br /> Mr. Ball felt that by that restaurant being gone. They were out of it. Correct? <br /> Mr.. Harrington stated that that was correct. But, right now they were showing 56 <br /> seats within that space and 1960 GPD. If that were truly were reduced to retail at 50 <br /> GPD per thousand square feet. He didn't look at the actual square footage of it. But, <br /> he figured that iovanni's was 2500 square feet. He would have to check on the <br /> square footage. <br /> Mr. McGrath interjected Haat to be blunt there were lawsuits going on between <br /> restaurant owners and the condominium. what the board ruled before was that the <br /> condominium owned the septic systems. So as a private matter Mr. HaJar was <br /> saying that he was not going to go over 10,000 GPD because it was going to cost <br /> him $700,000.00 versus $200,000.00. So he has filed suit saying that he was sorry <br /> restaurant owner, I own the septic system. The septic system was undersized. You <br /> will put in there what I determine to be the appropriate wastewater. Not what you <br /> might have a permit for because the department was telling them had to be less than <br /> 105000 CPI . These plans were drawn at a time before the restaurant was closed. He <br /> did not what they wanted to do with that. All he knew,.. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that he understood Mr. McGrath's positron. But, again it left <br /> the board with their quandary because the board had ruled that there were 70 seats in <br /> there and they couldn't approve a septic system that was showing a septic system <br /> designed on seats. Therefore, their.septic system was under-designed. <br /> Ms. Grady interjected that it was 70 seats in Carbo's instead of 58. <br /> Mr. Harrington re-iterated that that was what he was saying. That was where the <br /> problem lay. <br /> 7 <br />